§

Carpenters Local 470 (Tacoma Boatbuilding)

277 N.L.R.B. 513 (N.L.R.B. 1985)
Carpenters Local 470 (Tacoma Boatbuilding)

13 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co.

    388 U.S. 175 (1967)   Cited 334 times
    Holding that majority rule concept is at the center of federal labor policy

  2. Labor Board v. General Motors

    373 U.S. 734 (1963)   Cited 190 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that termination is also the appropriate sanction for failure to pay fees under an agency-shop clause

  3. Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    394 U.S. 423 (1969)   Cited 117 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Granite State Joint Board, Textile Workers Union of America, Local 1029

    409 U.S. 213 (1972)   Cited 53 times
    In NLRB v. Textile Workers, supra, and Machinists v. NLRB, 412 U.S. 84 (1973) (per curiam), the Court found as a corollary that unions may not fine former members who have resigned lawfully.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Boeing Co.

    412 U.S. 67 (1973)   Cited 49 times
    Upholding position that Board lacked power to review reasonableness of union disciplinary rule imposed on members who crossed picket line

  6. Booster Lodge No. 405, International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    412 U.S. 84 (1973)   Cited 35 times
    Holding the court of appeals may not properly overrule a decision of the Supreme Court in order to force its reconsideration

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Miranda Fuel Co., Inc.

    326 F.2d 172 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 98 times

    No. 73, Docket 26232. Argued October 21, 1963. Decided December 11, 1963. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Herman M. Levy, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Samuel J. Cohen, New York City (Jack Last and Cohen Weiss, New York City, on the brief), for respondent Union. Ruth

  8. Buckley v. Am. Fed. Television Radio Artists

    496 F.2d 305 (2d Cir. 1974)   Cited 37 times
    Reminding in dicta that "[t]here is no legal requirement for the press to present a `fair' balance of opinion and analysis. Subject only to the laws of libel, there is not even a requirement of truthfulness and accuracy."

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Hershey Foods Corporation

    513 F.2d 1083 (9th Cir. 1975)   Cited 21 times

    No. 74-2114. April 15, 1975. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Joseph E. Mayer, Atty., William R. Stewart, Atty. (argued), Washington, D. C., for petitioner. Duane B. Beeson, San Francisco, Cal. (argued), for respondent. George J. Tichy, II, San Francisco, for intervenor. Before CARTER, WRIGHT and WALLACE, Circuit Judges. OPINION WALLACE, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board brought this action to enforce its orders against Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen Helpers Union

  10. Union Starch Ref. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    186 F.2d 1008 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 51 times
    In Union Starch, the employees had tendered dues and an initiation fee but were denied membership in the union for refusal to file union application forms, attend a union meeting or take the union oath.