§

Carol D. Redmon, Complainant, v. Hearing No. 250-95-8126X Janice R. Lachance, Director, Office of Personnel Management, Agency.

05991100 (E.E.O.C. Aug. 25, 2000)
Carol D. Redmon, Complainant, v. Hearing No. 250-95-8126X Janice R. Lachance, Director, Office of Personnel Management, Agency.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody

    422 U.S. 405 (1975)   Cited 2,616 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employment policy cannot stand if another policy, "without a similarly undesirable racial effect, would also serve the employer's legitimate interest"

  2. Griggs v. Duke Power Co.

    401 U.S. 424 (1971)   Cited 2,765 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Holding that § 703(h) does not protect use of testing requirements with a disparate impact on racial minorities where the tests were not shown to be related to job performance

  3. Haithcock v. Frank

    958 F.2d 671 (6th Cir. 1992)   Cited 235 times
    Holding that plaintiff exhausted administrative remedies as to a theory of discrimination when the facts underlying the theory were apparent in the charge of discrimination

  4. Jensen v. Frank

    912 F.2d 517 (1st Cir. 1990)   Cited 183 times
    Holding that a Rule 16(f) determination is reviewable for abuse of discretion

  5. Gonzalez v. Firestone Tire Rubber Co.

    610 F.2d 241 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 220 times
    Holding that the EEOC has the authority to rescind one NTRS and replace it with another but only if it gives both parties notice of its intent to do so within the 90-day period provided by the initial NTRS

  6. Valentino v. United States Postal Service

    674 F.2d 56 (D.C. Cir. 1982)   Cited 163 times
    Holding that statistics that "did not demonstrate that women received grade increases less often than men as a regular occurrence" failed to establish disparate impact

  7. Beavers v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co.

    975 F.2d 792 (11th Cir. 1992)   Cited 116 times
    Holding that the continued maintenance of a pre-Title VII discriminatory benefits policy is actionable after the effective date of Title VII as a continuing violation of the statute

  8. Shehadeh v. Chesapeake Potomac Tel. Co.

    595 F.2d 711 (D.C. Cir. 1978)   Cited 121 times
    Holding that a practice of providing negative references to prospective employers with discriminatory motives "plainly would establish a severe constriction of job-market access.... erect artificial barriers that Congress endeavored to foreclose and ... is outlawed by Section 703."

  9. Reed v. Lockheed Aircraft Corp.

    613 F.2d 757 (9th Cir. 1980)   Cited 92 times
    Holding that plaintiff who did not apply for a promotion could establish prima facie case for discrimination where her employer's policy meant that an employee “had to be sought out” for promotion

  10. Rendon v. AT&T Technologies

    883 F.2d 388 (5th Cir. 1989)   Cited 35 times
    Holding that evidence in the form of statistical studies in addition to anecdotal testimony was sufficient to support a claim for disparate treatment

  11. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 51,688 times   129 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions