ยง

Cargill Poultry Co.

292 N.L.R.B. 738 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Cargill Poultry Co.

7 Cited authorities

  1. SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.

    397 U.S. 920 (1970)   Cited 200 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances

  2. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  3. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list

  4. Pennypower Shop. News, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    726 F.2d 626 (10th Cir. 1984)   Cited 11 times
    Holding that subsequent reinstatement did not alter a finding of discharge where that employer had created ambiguity as to its employees' status

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Southern Greyhound Lines

    426 F.2d 1299 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 24 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 27429. April 20, 1970. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Harold A. Boire, Director, Region 12, N.L.R.B., Tampa, Fla., for petitioner. Robert F. Houlihan, Lexington, Ky., for respondent. Before GOLDBERG, DYER and CARSWELL, Circuit Judges. GOLDBERG, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board here seeks enforcement of an order issued against Southern Greyhound Lines, Inc. Our basic problem revolves around the discharge of a conscientious

  6. Woodlawn Hospital v. N.L.R.B

    596 F.2d 1330 (7th Cir. 1979)   Cited 4 times
    Recognizing that where the Board properly finds a violation of the Act, it can order reinstatement under its remedial powers granted by ยง 160(c), although finding no violation of the Act here

  7. Shopmen's L. Un. No. 733 v. N.L.R.B

    219 F.2d 874 (6th Cir. 1955)   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 12285. March 2, 1955. Fred W. Elarbee, Jr., Atlanta, Ga. (Poole, Pearce Hall, Edwin Pearce, Atlanta, Ga., on the brief), for petitioner. Wilson Sims, Nashville, Tenn. (Cecil Sims, Bass, Berry Sims, Nashville, Tenn., on the brief), for intervener. Fannie M. Boyls, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, and Robert G. Johnson, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before MARTIN, MILLER and STEWART, Circuit Judges. MARTIN, Circuit Judge. The local A