§
Cardivan Co.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 471 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  2. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Associated Press v. Labor Board

    301 U.S. 103 (1937)   Cited 258 times
    Holding that the Associated Press's not-for-profit newsgathering activities "amount[ed] to commercial intercourse . . . within the meaning of the Constitution" because it "involve[d] the constant use of channels of interstate . . . communication"

  5. Peerless of America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    484 F.2d 1108 (7th Cir. 1973)   Cited 52 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Peerless, we stated that the Board's decision to issue such an order must be accompanied by "`specific findings' as to the immediate and residual impact of unfair labor practices on the election process... and `a detailed analysis' assessing the possibility of holding a fair election... and the potential effectiveness of ordinary remedies."

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Rich's of Plymouth, Inc.

    578 F.2d 880 (1st Cir. 1978)   Cited 25 times
    Holding that employer did not violate NLRA by following established policy of refusing to rehire union employees who quit

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Otis Hospital

    545 F.2d 252 (1st Cir. 1976)   Cited 25 times
    Withholding promised wage increase from all employees during union organizing campaign violated § 8

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Cable Vision, Inc.

    660 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 13 times

    No. 80-1611. Argued April 8, 1981. Decided September 18, 1981. Howard E. Perlstein, Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom William A. Lubbers, Gen. Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Acting Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and R. Michael Smith, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for petitioner. Julius Kirle, Chestnut Hills, Mass., for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CAMPBELL, BOWNES and BREYER

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Ajax Tool Works, Inc.

    713 F.2d 1307 (7th Cir. 1983)   Cited 11 times

    No. 81-2747. Submitted July 7, 1983. After preliminary examination of the briefs, the Court notified the parties that it had tentatively concluded that oral argument would not be helpful to the Court in this case. The notice provided that any party might file a "Statement as to Need of Oral Argument." See Rule 34(a), Fed.R.App.P.; Circuit Rule 14(f). Such a statement was filed by respondent on March 19, 1982. Upon consideration of that statement, the briefs, and the record, the request for oral argument

  10. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Condenser Corp.

    128 F.2d 67 (3d Cir. 1942)   Cited 62 times

    No. 7683. Argued January 5, 1942. Decided March 25, 1942. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the Board against Condenser Corporation of America and Cornell-Dubilier Electric Corporation, and Electrical Condensers Union, Local B-1041, of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, intervenor. A petition for leave to adduce additional evidence was filed. Petition for an enforcing decree granted with