§

Capitol Transportation Inc.

12-CA-180495 (N.L.R.B. Apr. 30, 2019)
Capitol Transportation Inc.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Bally's Park Place Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    646 F.3d 929 (D.C. Cir. 2011)   Cited 42 times
    Finding unlawful motive where employee's discharge came only days after manager observed him at pro-union rally

  4. Downey v. Clauder

    30 F.3d 681 (6th Cir. 1994)   Cited 39 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an order that did not "specif[y] a date" or command the contemnor "to act immediately" was not definite and specific

  5. Bath Marine v. N.L.R.B

    475 F.3d 14 (1st Cir. 2007)   Cited 20 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a motion for reconsideration was not required to exhaust where the Board had "adequate notice" of the party's position

  6. Adams & Assocs., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    871 F.3d 358 (5th Cir. 2017)   Cited 9 times
    Noting that although a successor contractor "was required to offer unit employees a right of first refusal under the EO and [Department of Labor (DOL)] regulations, this right of first refusal did not constitute a mandated blanket offer to all employees"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Consolidated Bus Transit

    577 F.3d 467 (2d Cir. 2009)   Cited 16 times
    Interpreting similar language in 29 C.F.R. § 101.10 as meaning "that the Board's procedures are to be controlled by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as far as practicable" (cleaned up)

  8. Autonation, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    801 F.3d 767 (7th Cir. 2015)   Cited 7 times
    Finding employer's claim that it fired employee due to job abandonment to be a pretext because employer knew that employee had filed for unemployment benefits and was under the impression that he had already been terminated and yet the company did nothing to correct the employee's alleged misimpression

  9. King Soopers, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    859 F.3d 23 (D.C. Cir. 2017)   Cited 5 times

    No. 16-1316 C/w 16-1367 06-09-2017 KING SOOPERS, INC., Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Raymond M. Deeny, Colorado Springs, CO, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Jonathon M. Watson, Denver, CO. Amy H. Ginn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Richard F. Griffin, Jr., General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Linda Dreeben, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Robert

  10. Holo-Krome Company v. N.L.R.B

    954 F.2d 108 (2d Cir. 1992)   Cited 23 times
    Denying petition for rehearing

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"