§

Capitol Steel And Iron Co.

299 N.L.R.B. 484 (N.L.R.B. 1990)
Capitol Steel And Iron Co.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Golden State Bottling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    414 U.S. 168 (1973)   Cited 497 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 65(d) allows enforcement of orders against successors of enjoined parties

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Jeffries Lithograph Co.

    752 F.2d 459 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 49 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Finding continuity where successor retained essentially same workforce in same plant doing same jobs under same supervisor with some of the same equipment, providing similar services

  5. Premium Foods, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    709 F.2d 623 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 31 times
    Holding that employees' requests for withdrawal cards, even if such requests indicated that the employees no longer wished to be members of the union, did “not necessarily indicate that [they] no longer wish to be represented by it”

  6. ZIM'S FOODLINER, INC. v. N.L.R.B

    495 F.2d 1131 (7th Cir. 1974)   Cited 44 times
    Holding that the owner of a single store purchased from the Kroger chain was a successor employer

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Band-Age, Inc.

    534 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1976)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that the diminution in an organization's size, and in the range of its products, does not preclude a finding of successorship

  8. Saks Co. v. N.L.R.B

    634 F.2d 681 (2d Cir. 1980)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that "diminution in unit size is insufficient to rebut the presumption of continued majority status"

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Security-Columbian Banknote Co.

    541 F.2d 135 (3d Cir. 1976)   Cited 23 times
    Noting the possibility that a “change in the control of a business enterprise [could] destroy a pre-existing bargaining unit”

  10. Nat. Labor Rel. Bd., v. Aquabrom, Div., Lakes

    862 F.2d 100 (6th Cir. 1988)   Cited 5 times
    In Aquabrom, the new enterprise acquired all the assets of the old company, including the machinery and equipment, continued production at the same location and the employees' functions and conditions remained unchanged.

  11. Section 637 - Additional powers

    15 U.S.C. § 637   Cited 336 times   37 Legal Analyses
    Conferring presumptive eligibility on anyone "found to be disadvantaged . . . pursuant to section 8 of the Small Business Act"