Capitol-Husting Co.
3 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal AnalysesHolding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
National Labor Bd. v. J.H. Rutter-Rex MFG
245 F.2d 594 (5th Cir. 1957) Cited 26 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. J.H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Company, 245 F.2d 594, we held that (1) the duty of the Company to bargain with the certified Union did not terminate with the calling or execution of the strike, (2) the Company had been guilty of unfair labor practices in refusing to bargain collectively with the Union and in interfering with the employees in the exercise of their right to organize and bargain collectively, and (3) the Union had not been guilty of any practice justifying employer in breaking off bargaining negotiations.
Pacific Gamble Robinson v. N.L.R.B
186 F.2d 106 (6th Cir. 1950) Cited 7 timesNo. 11124. December 19, 1950. Perry R. Moore and Robert W. Dygert, Minneapolis, Minn. (Perry R. Moore and Robert W. Dygert, Minneapolis, Minn., on the brief; Stinchfield, Mackall, Crounse Moore, Minneapolis, Minn., Sullivan, Veum Morhead, Sault Ste. Marie, Mich., of counsel), for petitioner. Clarence Meter, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Fannie M. Boyls, and Louis Schwartz, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before ALLEN, McALLISTER and