§
Capitol Fish Co.

13 Cited authorities

  1. Berger v. United States

    255 U.S. 22 (1921)   Cited 845 times
    Holding that the judge against whom an affidavit of bias is filed may pass on its legal sufficiency because "the reasons and facts for the belief the litigant entertains are an essential part of the affidavit, and must give fair support to the charge of a bent of mind that may prevent or impede impartiality of judgment."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Mattison Machine Works

    365 U.S. 123 (1961)   Cited 62 times
    Requiring showing of "prejudice to the fairness of the election"

  3. Willapoint Oysters v. Ewing

    174 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1949)   Cited 130 times
    In Willapoint Oysters v. Ewing (9th Cir. 1949) 174 F.2d 676, cert. denied 338 U.S. 860, 70 S.Ct. 101, 94 L.Ed. 527, rehearing den. 339 U.S. 945, 70 S.Ct. 793, 94 L.Ed. 1360, this Court relied upon Consolidated Edison to hold that hearsay alone, or even hearsay corroborated by a mere scintilla could never provide substantial evidence to support an administrative finding.

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Capitol Fish Company

    294 F.2d 868 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 58 times
    Holding that the Housekeeping Statute "cannot be construed to establish authority in the executive departments to determine whether certain papers and records are privileged," nor can it "bar a judicial determination of the question of privilege or a demand for the production of evidence found not privileged"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Greensboro Coca Cola Bottling Co.

    180 F.2d 840 (4th Cir. 1950)   Cited 35 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Greensboro Coca Cola Bottling Co., 4 Cir., 180 F.2d 840, 844, similar contentions were considered and determined.

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Knight Morley Corp.

    251 F.2d 753 (6th Cir. 1958)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that § 502's purpose was to give employees a right to walk off the job because of abnormally dangerous conditions "even in the face of a no-strike clause in their contract with an employer"

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Huntsville Mfg. Co.

    203 F.2d 430 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 22 times
    In NLRB v. Huntsville Mfg. Co., 203 F.2d 430 (5th Cir. 1953), this court articulated a standard of "reasonableness which courts may exact of the board in the exercise of the discretion accorded it in determining `whether or not the election should be set aside for irregularities in procedure.'"

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C. J. Camp, Inc.

    216 F.2d 113 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 15 times

    No. 15064. October 29, 1954. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel N.L.R.B., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel N.L.R.B., Ruth V. Reel, Arnold Ordman, Attorneys N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. E. Snow Martin, Lakeland, Fla., William F. Howe, Jerome Powell, Washington, D.C., Bryant Martin, Lakeland, Fla., Gall Lane Howe, Washington, D.C., Gall, Lane and Howe, Washington, D.C., for respondents. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and RIVES and TUTTLE, Circuit

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Quest-Shon Mark B

    185 F.2d 285 (2d Cir. 1950)   Cited 18 times

    No. 17, Docket 21624. Argued October 4, 1950. Decided November 9, 1950. Owsley Vose, Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and George H. Plaut, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Adolph I. King, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard P. Walsh, Washington, D.C., and Angelo A. Tumminelli, Brooklyn, N.Y., on the brief), for respondent. Before LEARNED HAND, Chief

  10. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Bryan Mfg. Co.

    196 F.2d 477 (7th Cir. 1952)   Cited 7 times

    No. 10553. April 25, 1952. David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Louis Schwartz, George J. Bott, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Albert M. Stern, Detroit, Mich., Stern, Milmet Rossier, Detroit, Mich., for respondent. Before KERNER, DUFFY, and FINNEGAN, Circuit Judges. KERNER, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board found that respondent had been guilty of violating § 8(a)(1), (2) and (3) of the