Capital Transit Co.
3 Cited authorities
H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board
311 U.S. 514 (1941) Cited 241 times 1 Legal AnalysesIn H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.
Great Southern Trucking Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
127 F.2d 180 (4th Cir. 1942) Cited 35 timesIn Great Southern Trucking Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 4 Cir., 127 F.2d 180, 185, we said: "An employer may not have a mind `hermetically sealed' against the acceptance of the proper procedure of collective bargaining in good faith; nor may an employer engage in such Fabian tactics as will practically render abortive the statutory rights of the employees."
National Labor Rel. Board v. Gittlin Bag Co.
196 F.2d 158 (4th Cir. 1952) Cited 3 timesNo. 6391. Argued April 8, 1952. Decided April 23, 1952. Ruth V. Reel, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and Arnold Ordman, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board all of Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. James M. Roberts, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER, and DOBIE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is a petition