§

Capital Transit Co.

114 N.L.R.B. 617 (N.L.R.B. 1955)
Capital Transit Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Whitin Mach. Works

    204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir. 1953)   Cited 57 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Whitin Machine Works, 204 F.2d 883 (1st Cir.1953), for example, an assistant supervisor in his employer's accounting department was, upon a consideration of the nature of his work, determined not to be a supervisor for purposes of litigating his discharge from employment, and, therefore, he was entitled to the protections of the National Labor Relations Act. 204 F.2d at 886.

  2. Precision Fabricators v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    204 F.2d 567 (2d Cir. 1953)   Cited 35 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 271, Docket 22653. Argued May 13, 1953. Decided June 22, 1953. Nixon, Hargrave, Devans Dey, Rochester, N.Y., Arthur L. Stern and William B. Lee, Jr., Rochester, N.Y., of counsel, for petitioner. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel; Samuel M. Singer and Melvin Spaeth, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and L. HAND and FRANK, Circuit Judges. SWAN, Chief Judge. This is a petition by an employer to

  3. Red Star Exp. Lines v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    196 F.2d 78 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 34 times
    In Red Star Express Lines v. National Labor Relations Board, 2 Cir., 196 F.2d 78, the court condemned the contract although the so-called general savings clause provided that any specific provision which was even "affected" by Taft-Hartley was to be without effect.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Quincy Steel Cast

    200 F.2d 293 (1st Cir. 1952)   Cited 31 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Quincy Steel Casting Co., 1 Cir., 200 F.2d 293, another case relied upon by the Board, the factual situation obtaining there is entirely different from that of the instant case, inasmuch as the employee was a molder the greater portion of his working time and there was evidence in the record that any skilled molder was competent to handle the job and that other workers engaged with him testified that the operation was more or less routine.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Leland-Gifford Co.

    200 F.2d 620 (1st Cir. 1952)   Cited 23 times

    No. 4654. December 22, 1952. Maurice Alexandre, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associated Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, all of Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. Ernest L. Anderson, Worcester, Mass., for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. WOODBURY, Circuit Judge. The principal issue presented by this petition for enforcement of an order of the National Labor

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Cap. Transit Co.

    221 F.2d 864 (D.C. Cir. 1955)   Cited 12 times

    No. 12259. Argued January 4, 1955. Decided February 17, 1955. Mr. Arnold Ordman, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of the bar of the Supreme Court of Massachusetts, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, for petitioner. Messrs. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, and Bernard Dunau, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, were on the brief, for petitioner. Messrs. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, and James C. Hise, Atty