3 Cited authorities
Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board
313 U.S. 146 (1941) Cited 294 timesIn Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.
Mountain States Tel. Tel. Co. v. N.L.R.B
310 F.2d 478 (10th Cir. 1962) Cited 9 timesNo. 7029. December 6, 1962. G.M. Westa, of Akolt, Turnquist, Shepherd Dick, Denver, Colo. (Carl F. Eiberger, Denver, Colo., on the brief), for petitioner. Herman M. Levy, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and James C. Paras, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Before PICKETT, BREITENSTEIN and HILL, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit Judge. In a representation proceeding
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. American Steel Buck
227 F.2d 927 (2d Cir. 1955) Cited 7 timesNo. 50, Docket 23577. Argued October 13, 1955. Decided December 1, 1955. Theophil C. Kammholz, David P. Findling, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Elizabeth W. Weston and Rose Mary Filipowicz, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Raphael, Searles, Levin Vischi, New York City (Sidney O. Raphael, New York City, of counsel), for respondent. Before FRANK, HINCKS and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. As the facts are fully stated in the Board's decision, reported in 110 N.L.R.B. No. 265, we shall not repeat them