Cantor Bros., Inc.

14 Cited authorities

Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.
395 U.S. 575 (1969) Cited 1,038 times 71 Legal Analyses
Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"
N.L.R.B. v. Gulfmont Hotel Company
362 F.2d 588 (5th Cir. 1966) Cited 43 times
No. 22340. June 24, 1966. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Theodore J. Martineau, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. H.L. Deakins, Jr., Houston, Tex., Fulbright, Crooker, Freeman, Bates Jaworski, Houston, Tex., of counsel, for appellee. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, RIVES, Circuit Judge, and CHOATE, District Judge. TUTTLE, Chief Judge: This petition by the
N.L.R.B. v. Little Rock Downtowner, Inc.
414 F.2d 1084 (8th Cir. 1969) Cited 37 times
No. 19427. August 19, 1969. Herman M. Levy, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Jonathan M. Marks, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief. Richard A. Brackhahn, of Fowler, Brackhahn Young, Memphis, Tenn., for respondent, Newell N. Fowler, Memphis, Tenn., on the brief. Before VAN OOSTERHOUT, Chief Judge, and VOGEL and HEANEY, Circuit Judges
Amalgamated Clothing Wkrs. of Am. v. N.L.R.B
424 F.2d 818 (D.C. Cir. 1970) Cited 36 times
Affirming Board determination that employer's evidence was not new because "no explanation was offered as to why this evidence was not discovered or could not have been discovered by the exercise of due diligence"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bradley Washfountain
192 F.2d 144 (7th Cir. 1951) Cited 55 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Bradley Washfountain Co., 7 Cir., 192 F.2d 144, 152, 153, we explicitly stated: "The cases involving the propriety of an employer's solicitation of individual employees, seem to fall into at least three classes.
N.L.R.B. v. Sky Wolf Sales
470 F.2d 827 (9th Cir. 1972) Cited 23 times
In Sky Wolf Sales, the employer's general manager, two non-union salesmen, and a warehouse foreman had assisted in circulating a decertification proceeding.
C.H. Guenther Son, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
427 F.2d 983 (5th Cir. 1970) Cited 21 times
No. 27495. June 1, 1970. Allen P. Schoolfield, Jr., Dallas, Tex., John H. Wood, Jr., San Antonio, Tex., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Abigail C. Basker, Washington, D.C., N.L.R.B., Clifford W. Potter, Director, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., for respondent. Before WISDOM, GOLDBERG, and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: This case is before the Court upon petition to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board issued against C.H. Guenther Son, Inc., doing
N.L.R.B. v. Denham
469 F.2d 239 (9th Cir. 1972) Cited 14 times
In Denham, supra, the court applied Burns and enforced a Board bargaining order against a successor where the union had been recognized on the basis of a card check almost 30 years prior to the ownership change.
N.L.R.B. v. Nu-Southern Dyeing Finishing
444 F.2d 11 (4th Cir. 1971) Cited 14 times
No. 14960. Argued April 5, 1971. Decided May 28, 1971. Paul J. Spielberg, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marjorie S. Gofreed, Atty., N.L.R.B., on brief), for petitioner. Ernest W. Machen, Jr., Charlotte, N.C. (Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on brief), for respondents. Before BRYAN, WINTER and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges. WINTER, Circuit Judge: Nu-Southern Dyeing Finishing, Inc. and
Little Rock Airmotive, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
455 F.2d 163 (8th Cir. 1972) Cited 10 times
No. 20350. February 9, 1972. Charles J. Lincoln, Philip K. Lyon, Little Rock, Ark., for petitioner; House, Holmes Jewell, Little Rock, Ark., of counsel. Charles N. Steele, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Michael S. Winer, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before MATTHES, Chief Judge, BRIGHT, Circuit Judge, and WEBSTER, District Judge. Eastern District

Cantor Bros., Inc.

14 Cited authorities

Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

Affirming Board determination that employer's evidence was not new because "no explanation was offered as to why this evidence was not discovered or could not have been discovered by the exercise of due diligence"

In N.L.R.B. v. Bradley Washfountain Co., 7 Cir., 192 F.2d 144, 152, 153, we explicitly stated: "The cases involving the propriety of an employer's solicitation of individual employees, seem to fall into at least three classes.

In Sky Wolf Sales, the employer's general manager, two non-union salesmen, and a warehouse foreman had assisted in circulating a decertification proceeding.

In Denham, supra, the court applied Burns and enforced a Board bargaining order against a successor where the union had been recognized on the basis of a card check almost 30 years prior to the ownership change.