§

Canopy Growth Corporation

86475899 (T.T.A.B. Jul. 16, 2019)
Canopy Growth Corporation

10 Cited authorities

  1. In re Cordua Rests., Inc.

    823 F.3d 594 (Fed. Cir. 2016)   Cited 25 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain words referring to key aspects of a genus of services were generic for those services

  2. In re Nett Designs, Inc.

    236 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2001)   Cited 28 times
    Finding that prior registrations of marks including the term ULTIMATE "do not conclusively rebut the Board's finding that ULTIMATE is descriptive in the context of this mark"

  3. University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. J.C. Gourmet Food Imports Co.

    703 F.2d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 1983)   Cited 19 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In University of Notre Dame Du Lac v. J.C. Gourmet Food Imports Co., 703 F.2d 1372, 1376, 217 USPQ 505, 509 (Fed. Cir. 1983), the court added that section 2(a) embraces concepts of the right to privacy which may be violated even in the absence of likelihood of confusion.

  4. Gray v. Daffy Dan's Bargaintown

    823 F.2d 522 (Fed. Cir. 1987)   Cited 6 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Appeal No. 86-1508. July 2, 1987. Mark Kusner, Cleveland, Ohio, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was D. Peter Hochberg. Roy H. Wepner, Lerner, David, Littenberg, Krumholz Mentlik, Westfield, N.J., argued for appellee. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and NIES and BISSELL, Circuit Judges. NIES, Circuit Judge. Daniel R. Gray appeals from the decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark

  5. Section 841 - Prohibited acts A

    21 U.S.C. § 841   Cited 91,654 times   147 Legal Analyses
    In § 841 prosecutions, then, it is the fact that the doctor issued an unauthorized prescription that renders his or her conduct wrongful, not the fact of the dispensation itself.

  6. Section 802 - Definitions

    21 U.S.C. § 802   Cited 3,970 times   81 Legal Analyses
    Excluding hemp from the schedules

  7. Section 1051 - Application for registration; verification

    15 U.S.C. § 1051   Cited 3,806 times   124 Legal Analyses
    Requiring a filing of a Statement of Use to register a mark

  8. Section 812 - Schedules of controlled substances

    21 U.S.C. § 812   Cited 2,829 times   76 Legal Analyses
    Criminalizing heroin

  9. Section 863 - Drug paraphernalia

    21 U.S.C. § 863   Cited 103 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Excluding "any item that, in the normal lawful course of business, is imported, exported, transported, or sold through the mail or by any other means, and traditionally intended for use with tobacco products, including any pipe, paper, or accessory"

  10. Section 2.126 - Form of submissions to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board

    37 C.F.R. § 2.126   Cited 1 times

    (a) Submissions must be made to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board via ESTTA. (1) Text in an electronic submission must be filed in at least 11-point type and double-spaced. (2) Exhibits pertaining to an electronic submission must be made electronically as an attachment to the submission and must be clear and legible. (b) In the event that ESTTA is unavailable due to technical problems, or when extraordinary circumstances are present, submissions may be filed in paper form. All submissions in paper