§

Candice B.,1 et al., Complainants, v. Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security (Customs and Border Protection), Agency.

0120160714 (E.E.O.C. Jun. 1, 2016)
Candice B.,1 et al., Complainants, v. Jeh Johnson, Secretary, Department of Homeland Security (Customs and Border Protection), Agency.

3 Cited authorities

  1. Gen. Tel. Co. of Sw. v. Falcon

    457 U.S. 147 (1982)   Cited 5,700 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that named plaintiff must prove “much more than the validity of his own claim”; the individual plaintiff must show that “the individual's claim and the class claims will share common questions of law or fact and that the individual's claim will be typical of the class claims,” explicitly referencing the “commonality” and “typicality” requirements of Rule 23

  2. Watson v. Fort Worth Bank Tr.

    487 U.S. 977 (1988)   Cited 1,380 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plaintiff has burden to show that a particular employment practice "caused the exclusion of applicants for jobs or promotions because of their membership in a protected group"

  3. Section 2000e-16 - Employment by Federal Government

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16   Cited 4,956 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Adopting provisions of § 2000e-5(f)-(k), including that "[e]ach United States district court . . . shall have jurisdiction of actions brought under this subchapter"