§
Can-Am Plumbing

15 Cited authorities

  1. San Diego Unions v. Garmon

    359 U.S. 236 (1959)   Cited 2,558 times   33 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "the States as well as the federal court must defer to the exclusive competence of the National Labor Relations Board" if "an activity is arguably subject to § 7 or § 8 of the [NLRA]"

  2. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 978 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law

  3. Sears, Roebuck Co. v. Carpenters

    436 U.S. 180 (1978)   Cited 554 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that both state and federal courts must defer to the National Labor Relations Board when an activity is arguably protected under § 7 or prohibited by § 8 of the NLRA

  4. Building & Construction Trades Council of the Metropolitan District v. Associated Builders & Contractors of Massachusetts/Rhode Island, Inc.

    507 U.S. 218 (1993)   Cited 343 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Boston's requiring a no-strike provision in subcontractor agreements was permissible market participation because the city was "attempting to ensure an efficient project that would be completed as quickly and effectively as possible" and because "analogous private conduct would be permitted"

  5. Brown v. Hotel Employees

    468 U.S. 491 (1984)   Cited 193 times
    Holding that when “state law regulates conduct that is actually protected by federal law ... the federal law must prevail”

  6. Allen Bradley Co. v. Union

    325 U.S. 797 (1945)   Cited 304 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the defendants were not protected by the statutory labor exemption because the union had combined with contractors and manufacturers in order to boycott the plaintiffs' business

  7. Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Local 302 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers; Local 180 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers; Local 332 International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers; Local 340 IBEW; Local 442 IBEW; Local 551 IBEW; Local 591 IBEW; Local 595 IBEW; Local 617 IBEW; Local 684 IBEW

    109 F.3d 1353 (9th Cir. 1997)   Cited 53 times
    Holding that extending preemption to permit parties to immunize their conduct from state law by including it in a labor contract "clearly exceeds the scope of § 301 preemption intended by Congress"

  8. Building and Const. Trades Dept., v. Reich

    40 F.3d 1275 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 45 times
    Holding that an employer's motion to intervene as a defendant was properly denied under Rule 24 when the employer “offered no argument not also pressed by” the government

  9. International Broth. of Elec. Workers v. Brock

    68 F.3d 1194 (9th Cir. 1995)   Cited 14 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the direct and voluntary payment of rebates of Davis-Bacon wages to a targeting fund is not permitted

  10. United Food Commercial Workers v. N.L.R.B

    74 F.3d 292 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 9 times
    Finding that employer may deny access to nonemployees seeking to trespass on the employer's property for purpose of distributing handbills to customers regarding "boycott" activity

  11. Section 186 - Restrictions on financial transactions

    29 U.S.C. § 186   Cited 2,360 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting payments to labor union officials

  12. Section 221 - Collection of paid wages

    Cal. Lab. Code § 221   Cited 341 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Prohibiting "any employer to collect or receive from an employee any part of wages theretofore paid by said employer to said employee"

  13. Section 223 - Payments below scale

    Cal. Lab. Code § 223   Cited 212 times
    Making it unlawful to "secretly pay a lower wage while purporting to pay the wage designated by statute or by contract"