§

Campbell Electric Co.

340 N.L.R.B. 825 (N.L.R.B. 2003)
Campbell Electric Co.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader

    310 U.S. 469 (1940)   Cited 532 times
    Holding that violent union take over of factory did not implicate antitrust laws

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice

  4. Harmonay Inc. v. Binks Mfg. Co.

    762 F.2d 990 (2d Cir. 1985)   Cited 61 times
    Adopting Restatement (Second) Conflicts of Law § 187

  5. O'Neil's Markets v. United Food

    95 F.3d 733 (8th Cir. 1996)   Cited 12 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employer cannot exclude handbillers unless they interfere with the right of employer, employees and customers to use the easement property

  6. Marshall Durbin Poultry Co. v. N.L.R.B

    39 F.3d 1312 (5th Cir. 1994)   Cited 13 times

    No. 93-4057. December 16, 1994. Sidney F. Lewis, Henry T. Arrington, Kullman, Inman, Bee, Downing Banta, New Orleans, LA, for appellant. William Baudler, Aileen Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg N.L.R.B., Washington, DC, for appellee. Hugh Frank Malone, Regional Director, N.L.R.B., Region 15, New Orleans, LA, for other Interested Parties. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. Before REAVLEY, GARWOOD

  7. Sam's Club v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    141 F.3d 653 (6th Cir. 1998)   Cited 6 times
    Granting request for enforcement of NLRB decision finding that an employer violated the NLRA where substantial evidence suggested that it disciplined an employee for circulating a petition about a wage grievance and distributing NLRB informational pamphlets to her co-workers

  8. Jeannette Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    532 F.2d 916 (3d Cir. 1976)   Cited 25 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Sustaining the Board's finding that the employer's rule broadly prohibiting wage discussions was an unfair labor practice under § 8, reasoning that "wage discussions can be protected activity and that an employer's unqualified rule barring such discussions has the tendency to inhibit such activity"

  9. Shelly & Anderson Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    497 F.2d 1200 (9th Cir. 1974)   Cited 20 times
    In Shelly Anderson Furniture Manufacturing Co. v. NLRB, 497 F.2d 1200 (9th Cir. 1974), we identified the four elements essential to protected status of concerted activity.

  10. Santa Fe Drilling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    416 F.2d 725 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 25 times

    No. 22923. September 18, 1969. James N. Adler (argued) Roderick M. Hills, of Munger, Tolles, Hills Rickershauser, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Ronald Wm. Egnor (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before CARTER and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge. Hon. William M. Byrne, Senior Judge, United States District Court for the Central