§
Camelot Terrace

31 Cited authorities

  1. Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.

    501 U.S. 32 (1991)   Cited 9,486 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that courts "may bar from the courtroom a criminal defendant who disrupts a trial" may "assess attorney fees when a party has acted in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive reasons," and "may act sua sponte to dismiss a suit for failure to prosecute"

  2. Link v. Wabash Railroad Co.

    370 U.S. 626 (1962)   Cited 25,226 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Rule 41(b)'s allowance for a party to move to dismiss for failure to prosecute did not implicitly abrogate the court's power to dismiss sua sponte

  3. Alyeska Pipeline Co. v. Wilderness Soc'y

    421 U.S. 240 (1975)   Cited 4,786 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding American Rule governed absent specific statutory authorization for awarding attorney fees to prevailing party

  4. Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper

    447 U.S. 752 (1980)   Cited 2,911 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a court may impose attorney's fee sanction against opposing counsel for “abusive litigation practices” only in “narrowly defined circumstances,” including where the court makes a finding that “counsel's conduct ... constituted or was tantamount to bad faith”

  5. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite

    396 U.S. 375 (1970)   Cited 1,418 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that causation of damages by materially misleading proxy misstatement could be established by showing that proxy solicitation was an "essential link in the accomplishment of the transaction"

  6. F. D. Rich Co., v. Industrial Lumber Co.

    417 U.S. 116 (1974)   Cited 984 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Miller Act requirement that suits be brought in specific federal courts was “merely a venue requirement” that could be waived

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  8. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  9. Summit Valley Industries, Inc. v. Carpenters

    456 U.S. 717 (1982)   Cited 178 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Labor Management Relations Act § 303, which authorizes recovery of "damages" for employers injured by an unfair labor practice, does not provide authorization for awarding attorney's fees for Board proceedings

  10. Checkosky v. S.E.C

    23 F.3d 452 (D.C. Cir. 1994)   Cited 112 times
    Rejecting the proposition that all arbitrary and capricious agency action must be "set aside" or "vacated" because it would "fundamentally alter the role of the judiciary vis-a-vis administrative agencies by forcing courts to decide that the agency's action is either unlawful or lawful on the first pass, even when the judges are . . . not confident that they have discerned the agency's full rationale"

  11. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,059 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB

  12. Section 187 - Unlawful activities or conduct; right to sue; jurisdiction; limitations; damages

    29 U.S.C. § 187   Cited 710 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Providing for actions to enforce the prohibitions against secondary boycotts