§
Cambro Mfg. Co.

29 Cited authorities

  1. Hudgens v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    424 U.S. 507 (1976)   Cited 543 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding picketers "did not have a First Amendment right to enter [a privately owned] shopping center for the purpose of advertising their strike"

  2. Labor Board v. Babcock Wilcox Co.

    351 U.S. 105 (1956)   Cited 294 times   19 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board could not require an employer to allow non-employee union representatives to enter the employer's parking lot

  3. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  4. Labor Board v. Fansteel Corp.

    306 U.S. 240 (1939)   Cited 281 times
    In Fansteel, the Board awarded reinstatement with backpay to employees who engaged in a "sit down strike" that led to confrontation with local law enforcement officials.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Oakes Mach. Corp.

    897 F.2d 84 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 22 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Listing reasonableness as one of four factors in determining whether the termination of supervisors affected terms and conditions of employees

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Guernsey-Muskingum Electric Co-op

    285 F.2d 8 (6th Cir. 1960)   Cited 58 times
    Finding concerted activity because "a reasonable inference can be drawn that the men involved considered that they had a grievance and decided, among themselves, that they would take it up with management"

  7. Hugh H. Wilson Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 1345 (3d Cir. 1969)   Cited 37 times
    Finding concerted activity because "[i]n substance, the employees had a gripe. They assembled. They presented their grievance to management. . . ."

  8. Abilities and Goodwill, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    612 F.2d 6 (1st Cir. 1979)   Cited 22 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Listing factors to be considered when determining whether concerted action is protected

  9. Joanna Cotton Mills v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    176 F.2d 749 (4th Cir. 1949)   Cited 60 times
    Holding that circulation of a petition by an employee for the removal of a foreman against whom the employee held a personal grudge was not protected activity

  10. Molon Motor & Coil Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    965 F.2d 523 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 4 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 91-1885, 91-2222. Argued January 9, 1992. Decided June 19, 1992. As Amended July 15, 1992. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied July 27, 1992. John C. Truesdale, Paul J. Spielberg (argued), N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, D.C., Elizabeth Kinney, N.L.R.B., Chicago, Ill., Aileen A. Armstrong, N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., for N.L.R.B. Steven L. Gillman (argued), Davi L. Hirsch, Fox Grove, Chicago, Ill., for Molon Motor Coil Corp. Susan

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"