86 F.3d 277 (2d Cir. 1996) Cited 107 times
Holding that it was a violation of §§ 1341 and 1343 to “lie in order to deprive [the victim] of control over its own assets,” and noting that the “right to control theory” of money or property fraud “is predicated on a showing that some person or entity has been deprived of potentially valuable economic information”