California Gas Transport, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore
439 U.S. 322 (1979) Cited 4,295 times 8 Legal Analyses
Holding that district courts have discretion to refuse to apply offensive non-mutual collateral estoppel against a defendant if such an application of the doctrine would be unfair
Montana v. United States
440 U.S. 147 (1979) Cited 3,638 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding that "once an issue is actually and necessarily determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, that determination is conclusive in subsequent suits based on a different cause of action involving a party to the prior litigation"
Lawlor v. Nat'l Screen Serv.
349 U.S. 322 (1955) Cited 889 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that two suits were not "based on the same cause of action," because "[t]he conduct presently complained of was all subsequent to" the prior judgment and it "cannot be given the effect of extinguishing claims which did not even then exist and which could not possibly have been sued upon in the previous case"
Cromwell v. County of Sac
94 U.S. 351 (1876) Cited 1,575 times 3 Legal Analyses
Holding for the purpose of res judicata that, because the two suits involved separate contracts, a prior suit for recovery of coupons attached to bonds did not involve the same claim as a later suit for recovery of later maturing coupons attached to the same bonds
N.L.R.B. v. Centra, Inc.
954 F.2d 366 (6th Cir. 1992) Cited 16 times
Finding that employer implemented its plan secretly and failed to inform union until too late to bargain
Ciba-Geigy Pharmaceuticals Div. v. N.L.R.B
722 F.2d 1120 (3d Cir. 1983) Cited 17 times
In Ciba-Geigy Pharmaceuticals Division v. NLRB, 722 F.2d 1120 (3d Cir. 1983), the court rejected an argument that an "extracontractual residual rights" theory allowed imposition of attendance rules.

California Gas Transport, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore

Holding that district courts have discretion to refuse to apply offensive non-mutual collateral estoppel against a defendant if such an application of the doctrine would be unfair

Montana v. United States

Holding that "once an issue is actually and necessarily determined by a court of competent jurisdiction, that determination is conclusive in subsequent suits based on a different cause of action involving a party to the prior litigation"

Lawlor v. Nat'l Screen Serv.

Cromwell v. County of Sac

Holding for the purpose of res judicata that, because the two suits involved separate contracts, a prior suit for recovery of coupons attached to bonds did not involve the same claim as a later suit for recovery of later maturing coupons attached to the same bonds

N.L.R.B. v. Centra, Inc.

Finding that employer implemented its plan secretly and failed to inform union until too late to bargain

Ciba-Geigy Pharmaceuticals Div. v. N.L.R.B

In Ciba-Geigy Pharmaceuticals Division v. NLRB, 722 F.2d 1120 (3d Cir. 1983), the court rejected an argument that an "extracontractual residual rights" theory allowed imposition of attendance rules.