16 Cited authorities
Chemical Workers v. Pittsburgh Glass
404 U.S. 157 (1971) Cited 630 times 7 Legal AnalysesHolding retirees are not "employees" within the bargaining unit
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.
385 U.S. 432 (1967) Cited 265 times 4 Legal AnalysesApproving "discovery-type standard"
H. K. Porter Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
397 U.S. 99 (1970) Cited 222 times 2 Legal AnalysesHolding that the NLRB is "without power to compel a company or a union to agree to any substantive contractual provision of a collective-bargaining agreement."
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Strong
393 U.S. 357 (1969) Cited 115 timesExplaining that, though broad, the NLRA's grant of remedial power "does not authorize punitive measures"
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. C & C Plywood Corp.
385 U.S. 421 (1967) Cited 117 timesHolding that the NLRB has the authority to interpret CBAs in the first instance where its interpretation is for the purpose of “enforc[ing] a statutory right which Congress considered necessary to allow labor and management to get on with the process of reaching fair terms and conditions of employment”
Industrial Un. of Mar. Ship. W. v. N.L.R.B
320 F.2d 615 (3d Cir. 1963) Cited 63 times 4 Legal AnalysesNos. 14052, 14102. Argued May 21, 1963. Decided July 30, 1963. M.H. Goldstein, Philadelphia, Pa. (Goldstein Barkan, Michael Brodie, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner, Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America, AFL-CIO. John H. Morse, New York City (Frank Cummings, New York City, Cravath, Swaine Moore, New York City, on the brief), for Bethlehem Steel Co. (Shipbuilding Division). Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli
C-B Buick, Incorporated v. N.L.R.B
506 F.2d 1086 (3d Cir. 1974) Cited 29 timesNo. 73-2068. Argued September 6, 1974. Decided November 14, 1974. H. David Rothman, Pittsburgh, Pa., for petitioner. William H. DuRoss, III, Atty., Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before SEITZ, Chief Judge, and GIBBONS and GARTH, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT GARTH, Circuit Judge
Food Store Emp. U., Loc. No. 347 v. N.L.R.B
476 F.2d 546 (D.C. Cir. 1973) Cited 20 timesUpholding Board refusal to extend bargaining order to unrepresented store
N.L.R.B. v. George E. Light Boat Storage, Inc.
373 F.2d 762 (5th Cir. 1967) Cited 22 timesNo. 22962. February 28, 1967. As Modified March 23, 1967. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Richard S. Rodin, Atty., NLRB, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Gary Green, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert R. Breaker, LaPorte, Tex., for respondent. Before WISDOM, BELL, and AINSWORTH, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board seeks a decree enforcing its order of July 2, 1965, against the George E. Light
N.L.R.B. v. SCAM INSTRUMENT CORPORATION
394 F.2d 884 (7th Cir. 1968) Cited 14 timesNo. 16599. May 15, 1968. Rehearing Denied June 26, 1968. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Burton L. Raimi, Attorneys, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, for petitioner. George L. Plumb, Chicago, Ill., Peer Pedersen, Chicago, Ill., for respondent; Pedersen Houpt, Chicago, Ill., of counsel. Before KNOCH, Senior Circuit Judge, and CASTLE and KILEY, Circuit Judges. CASTLE, Circuit Judge. This case
Section 1281.2 - Grounds for not ordering parties to arbitrate controversy
Cal. Code Civ. Proc. § 1281.2 Cited 1,463 times 7 Legal AnalysesStating that an order compelling arbitration “may not be refused on the ground that the petitioner's contentions lack substantive merit”