§

Calhoun Foods, LLC d/b/a Key Food

29-CA-030861 (N.L.R.B. May. 8, 2012)
Calhoun Foods, LLC d/b/a Key Food

7 Cited authorities

  1. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 371 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 480 times   50 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  3. Avecor, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    931 F.2d 924 (D.C. Cir. 1991)   Cited 68 times
    Noting that inferences drawn from expertise may "reduce the weight of evidence necessary to impute knowledge ... but ... do not wholly eliminate the need for evidence"

  4. Evergreen America v. N.L.R.B

    531 F.3d 321 (4th Cir. 2008)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 06-2105, 06-2183. Argued January 31, 2008. Decided June 26, 2008. Appeal from the petition for review of order of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), 2006 WL 2737630. ARGUED: Francis X. Dee, McElroy, Deutsch, Mulvaney Carpenter, L.L.P., Newark, New Jersey, for Evergreen America Corporation. David Arthur Fleischer, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, DC, for the National Labor Relations Board. Herzl Sol Eisenstadt, Marrinan Mazzola Mardon, P.C., New York, New York, for Intervenor

  5. Shares, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    433 F.3d 939 (7th Cir. 2006)   Cited 5 times
    Explaining that in the context of the National Labor Relations Act, "substantial continuity" is assessed by focusing on a variety of factors, such as "whether the business of both enterprises is the same; whether the employees of the new company are doing the same job under the same working conditions with the same supervisors; and whether the new entity has the same production process, produces the same products and basically has the same body of customers as the former company"

  6. Manor Care of Easton, PA., LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    661 F.3d 1139 (D.C. Cir. 2011)

    Nos. 10–1411 11–1011. 2011-11-22 MANOR CARE OF EASTON, PA., LLC, doing business as Manorcare Health Services–Easton, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.Service Employees International Union Healthcare Pennsylvania (SEIU Healthcare PA), Intervenor. On Petition for Review and Cross–Application for Enforcement of An Order of the National Labor Relations Board.Charles P. Roberts, III argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Clifford H. Nelson Jr. Kellie Isbell

  7. Colson Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.2d 128 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 35 times
    Finding that a repudiation three weeks after unlawful conduct was inadequate