§

Caldwell Mfg. Co.

346 N.L.R.B. 1159 (N.L.R.B. 2006)
Caldwell Mfg. Co.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  2. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  3. American Federation of Television & Radio Artists v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    395 F.2d 622 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 102 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Applying Taft

  4. United States Testing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    160 F.3d 14 (D.C. Cir. 1998)   Cited 18 times
    Rejecting employer's contention that it had insufficient notice regarding the potential relevance of a union request for individual insurance claims information because "context is everything," and the employer "put on the table" the concern of growing health care costs

  5. Richmond Recording Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    836 F.2d 289 (7th Cir. 1987)   Cited 30 times
    Asserting that an impasse does not exist unless "[b]oth parties ... believe that they are at the end of their rope"

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Public Serv. Elec. Gas Co.

    157 F.3d 222 (3d Cir. 1998)   Cited 11 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Joining several courts of appeals in applying the clear and unequivocal notice rule, namely that "[t]he 10(b) period begins when the victim of an unfair labor practice receives unequivocal notice of a final adverse decision. Rumors or suspicions will not do. . . ."

  7. Graphic Communications Int. v. N.L.R.B

    977 F.2d 1168 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 14 times   4 Legal Analyses

    No. 91-3901. Argued September 25, 1992. Decided October 21, 1992. Lee W. Jackson, Martin Ganzglass, O'Donnell, Schwartz Anderson, Washington, D.C., Thomas F. Phalen, Jr. (argued), Logothetis Pence, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Robert J. Englehart (argued), N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Lawrence T. Zimmerman (argued), Washington, D.C., Charles M. Roesch, Dinsmore Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, for

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Plymouth Stamping Division, Eltec Corp.

    870 F.2d 1112 (6th Cir. 1989)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that company’s decision to transfer and subcontract its parts assembly operation was a mandatory bargaining subject because the transfer did not significantly alter the nature of the company’s business, company incurred no significant capital expenditures, and transfer occurred shortly after company unsuccessfully sought economic concessions from the union

  9. Litton Microwave Cooking Products v. N.L.R.B

    868 F.2d 854 (6th Cir. 1989)   Cited 13 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Stating that courts "will not normally disturb the credibility assessments of the [ARB] or an administrative law judge, `who has observed the demeanor of the witnesses'"

  10. Saunders House v. N.L.R.B

    719 F.2d 683 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 15 times
    In Saunders House, the Third Circuit addressed the narrow question of whether a union's on-the-record concession regarding wage increases constituted sufficient movement to preclude impasse, when the employer had not directly rejected the concession, but had previously rejected the same offer communicated in an off-the-record exchange.