§

Calamity Williams, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Capital Metro Area), Agency.

0120101414 (E.E.O.C. Dec. 15, 2011)
Calamity Williams, Complainant, v. Patrick R. Donahoe, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service (Capital Metro Area), Agency.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,707 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Pullman-Standard v. Swint

    456 U.S. 273 (1982)   Cited 1,630 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[w]hen an appellate court discerns that a district court has failed to make a finding because of an erroneous view of the law, the usual rule is that there should be a remand for further proceedings to permit the trial court to make the missing findings"

  3. Mengine v. Runyon

    114 F.3d 415 (3d Cir. 1997)   Cited 263 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding summary judgment proper where defendant makes good faith effort to engage in interactive process, communicate with plaintiff, and accommodate his disability

  4. Section 2000e - Definitions

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e   Cited 52,877 times   132 Legal Analyses
    Granting EEOC authority to issue procedural regulations to carry out Title VII provisions

  5. Section 794 - Nondiscrimination under Federal grants and programs

    29 U.S.C. § 794   Cited 12,778 times   30 Legal Analyses
    Adopting ADA standards for Rehabilitation Act claims

  6. Section 791 - Employment of individuals with disabilities

    29 U.S.C. § 791   Cited 2,319 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Adopting standards for ADA claims under § 501 of the Rehabilitation Act, including 42 U.S.C. § 12112, which forbids discrimination "against a qualified individual with a disability because of the disability . . ."

  7. Section 1630.2 - Definitions

    29 C.F.R. § 1630.2   Cited 8,583 times   141 Legal Analyses
    Holding that major life activity is substantially limited if plaintiff is "significantly restricted in the ability to perform either a class of jobs or a broad range of jobs in various classes as compared to the average person having comparable training, skills and abilities"