§
Cal-Maine Farms

3 Cited authorities

  1. Farmers Irrigation Co. v. McComb

    337 U.S. 755 (1949)   Cited 145 times   2 Legal Analyses
    In Farmers Reservoir, for example, the Supreme Court concluded that "the physical operation, control and maintenance" of "canals, reservoirs, and headgates" for a company that stored water and distributed it to farms through the company's canals were activities "[c]learly... not done on a farm."

  2. Beaird-Poulan Division, Emerson, v. N.L.R.B

    649 F.2d 589 (8th Cir. 1981)   Cited 23 times
    Reading the determinative factor in Georgetown Dress to be the lack of a professional organizer on the scene

  3. Rule 803 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness

    Fed. R. Evid. 803   Cited 13,109 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing exception to rule against hearsay for records of regularly conducted activities