Caibao Meat Products, Inc., 02-CA-236943

7 Cited authorities

  1. Central States Pension Fund v. Central Transp

    472 U.S. 559 (1985)   Cited 626 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding ERISA fiduciaries to the "more specific trustee duties itemized in the Act"
  2. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
  3. Moglia v. Geoghegan

    403 F.2d 110 (2d Cir. 1968)   Cited 120 times
    Holding that Section 302 was violated where "[a]ppellant conceded ... that at no time relevant ... there was a collective bargaining agreement or any written agreement" between the employer and the union
  4. Alwin Mfg. Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    192 F.3d 133 (D.C. Cir. 1999)   Cited 30 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the striking employees' motivation for striking is central to a finding of an unfair labor practice strike
  5. Trustees of the UIU Health & Welfare Fund v. New York Flame Proofing Co.

    828 F.2d 79 (2d Cir. 1987)   Cited 30 times
    Finding agreement enforceable where multi-employer association had no written authorization from members and members never signed agreement
  6. National Leadburners v. O.G. Kelley Company

    129 F.3d 372 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 17 times
    In National Leadburners Health Welfare Fund v. O.G. Kelley Co., 129 F.3d 372 (6th Cir. 1997), the Sixth Circuit distinguished its prior decision in Merrimen v. Paul F. Rost Electric, Inc., 861 F.2d 135 (6th Cir. 1988).
  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second