Cactus Petroleum, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Seven-Up Co.
344 U.S. 344 (1953) Cited 368 times
Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding
Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
321 U.S. 678 (1944) Cited 270 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8
Southern S.S. Co. v. Labor Board
316 U.S. 31 (1942) Cited 160 times 2 Legal Analyses
Finding an abuse of discretion where the National Labor Relations Board sought to fulfill one congressional objective but “wholly ignore[d] other and equally important Congressional objectives”
Labor Board v. Sands Mfg. Co.
306 U.S. 332 (1939) Cited 139 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Sands Mfg. Co., 306 U.S. 332, 59 S.Ct. 508, 83 L.Ed. 682, affirming the ruling of this Court in 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 721, the Supreme Court held the employer justified in abandoning further negotiations with the Union when conditions showed the uselessness of continuing with them.
Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board
185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950) Cited 162 times 2 Legal Analyses
In Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Draper Corp.
145 F.2d 199 (4th Cir. 1944) Cited 48 times
No. 5239. October 6, 1944. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the Board which directed the Draper Corporation to cease and desist from unfair labor practices. Petition denied. Guy Farmer, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, of Washington, D.C. (Alvin J. Rockwell, General Counsel, Malcolm F. Halliday, Associate General Counsel, Joseph B. Robison, and Dominick
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Sunshine Mining Co.
110 F.2d 780 (9th Cir. 1940) Cited 54 times
No. 9162. April 3, 1940. Rehearing Granted, Decree Confirmed June 19, 1940. Petition to Enforce An Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition filed by the National Labor Relations Board to enforce an order issued by it in proceedings instituted by the board against the Sunshine Mining Company. Judgment enforcing the order as modified. Charles Fahy, Gen. Counsel, Robert B. Watts, Laurence A. Knapp and Malcolm F. Halliday, Asst. Gen. Counsels, and Leonard Appel, Atty., all of National Labor
N.L.R.B. v. H. Rohtstein Co.
266 F.2d 407 (1st Cir. 1959) Cited 11 times
In NLRB v. Rohtstein Co., 266 F.2d 407, 409 (CA1, 1959), the First Circuit held that similar misrepresentations invalidated a card necessary for a majority, and therefore declined to enforce the Board's bargaining order.
Central Mercedita, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
288 F.2d 809 (1st Cir. 1961) Cited 2 times
No. 5678. April 13, 1961. Orlando J. Antonsanti, San Juan, P.R., for petitioner. Melvin J. Welles, Attorney, Washington, D.C., with whom Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, and Elizabeth W. Weston, Attorney, Washington, D.C., on brief, for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and MAGRUDER and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. Sitting by designation. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. This is a petition to review and set
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Buzza-Cardozo
205 F.2d 889 (9th Cir. 1953) Cited 8 times
No. 13486. July 15, 1953. Rehearing Denied August 6, 1953. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Bernard Dunau and Abraham Siegel, Washington, D.C. (Fredrick Reel, Washington, D.C., argued), for petitioner. Hill, Farrer Burrill, Carl M. Gould, Los Angeles, Cal. (Ray L. Johnson, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., argued), for respondent. Before MATHEWS, HEALY, and BONE, Circuit Judges. HEALY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations

Cactus Petroleum, Inc.

13 Cited authorities

Upholding the Board's application of a back pay remedy different from that previously imposed in similar cases, despite no announcement of new remedial rule in rulemaking proceeding

Holding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate § 8

Finding an abuse of discretion where the National Labor Relations Board sought to fulfill one congressional objective but “wholly ignore[d] other and equally important Congressional objectives”

In N.L.R.B. v. Sands Mfg. Co., 306 U.S. 332, 59 S.Ct. 508, 83 L.Ed. 682, affirming the ruling of this Court in 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 721, the Supreme Court held the employer justified in abandoning further negotiations with the Union when conditions showed the uselessness of continuing with them.

In NLRB v. Rohtstein Co., 266 F.2d 407, 409 (CA1, 1959), the First Circuit held that similar misrepresentations invalidated a card necessary for a majority, and therefore declined to enforce the Board's bargaining order.