Cabinet Manufacturing Corp.

11 Cited authorities

Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.
356 U.S. 342 (1958) Cited 296 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG
205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953) Cited 118 times
In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."
N.L.R.B. v. Griggs Equipment, Inc.
307 F.2d 275 (5th Cir. 1962) Cited 52 times
In Griggs, the issue was not even mentioned in the Board's Decision, but is noted in the decision of the court of appeals.
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Deena Artware
198 F.2d 645 (6th Cir. 1952) Cited 43 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Inc., 198 F.2d 645, this Court granted an order of enforcement similar to one in the case now before us. The Board's Supplemental Decision and Order for the payment of back wages was enforced in that case by this Court in National Labor Relations Board v. Deena Artware, Incorporated, reported at 228 F.2d 871.
N.L.R.B. v. Southern Airways Company
290 F.2d 519 (5th Cir. 1961) Cited 21 times
No. 18333. May 19, 1961. Rosanna A. Blake, Atty., NLRB, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, A. Brummel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, M.A. Prowell, Constangy Prowell, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before JONES and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and CARSWELL, District Judge. JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge. The Board seeks enforcement of its order finding Section 8(a)
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Montgomery Ward
242 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1957) Cited 23 times
No. 211, Docket 24251. Argued January 11, 1957. Decided March 18, 1957. Theophil C. Kammholtz, Gen. Counsel, Stephen Leonard, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer and Florian J. Bartosic, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Charles J. Barnhill and David L. Dickson, Chicago, Ill., and T.W. Madden, New York, N.Y., for respondent. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges. LUMBARD, Circuit Judge. The National Labor
National Labor Rel. Board v. Dalton Tel. Co.
187 F.2d 811 (5th Cir. 1951) Cited 14 times
In Dalton Telephone, however, the court strongly suggested that the company's insistence on the union registration was simply a ploy to avoid reducing to writing an agreement to which the parties had already agreed.
Prudential Insurance Co. of Am. v. N.L.R.B
278 F.2d 181 (3d Cir. 1960) Cited 5 times
No. 13071. Argued March 22, 1960. Decided April 21, 1960. Nahum A. Bernstein and George H. Kaplan, New York City (Silver, Bernstein, Seawell Kaplan, New York City, on the brief), for petitioner. Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Associate General Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Donald J. Bardell, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Isaac N. Groner, Washington, D.C
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Denton
217 F.2d 567 (5th Cir. 1954) Cited 9 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Denton, 5 Cir., 217 F.2d 567, 570, also decided by this Court, we considered as part of the record which we found supported a finding of failure to bargain in good faith repeated statements by the employer and his supervisors that Denton "would never sign a contract with any union."
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Roscoe Skipper
213 F.2d 793 (5th Cir. 1954) Cited 6 times
No. 14885. June 18, 1954. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Rose Mary Filipowicz, Atty., N.L.R.B., George J. Bott. General Counsel, Owsley Vose, John C. Rohrbaugh, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. E. Kontz Bennett, Waycross, Ga. (Bennett, Pedrick Bennett, Waycross, Ga., of counsel), for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, RIVES, Circuit Judge, and DAWKINS, District Judge. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. This small tempest
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

Cabinet Manufacturing Corp.

11 Cited authorities

In Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."

In Griggs, the issue was not even mentioned in the Board's Decision, but is noted in the decision of the court of appeals.

In Dalton Telephone, however, the court strongly suggested that the company's insistence on the union registration was simply a ploy to avoid reducing to writing an agreement to which the parties had already agreed.

In N.L.R.B. v. Denton, 5 Cir., 217 F.2d 567, 570, also decided by this Court, we considered as part of the record which we found supported a finding of failure to bargain in good faith repeated statements by the employer and his supervisors that Denton "would never sign a contract with any union."

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"