CAB Associates

18 Cited authorities

Jim McNeff, Inc. v. Todd
461 U.S. 260 (1983) Cited 132 times
Holding that "[n]othing in the legislative history of § 8(f) indicates Congress intended employers to obtain free the benefits of stable labor costs, labor peace, and the use of the union hiring hall. Having had the music, he must pay the piper."
Brian Clewer v. Pan American World Airways
484 U.S. 925 (1987) Cited 55 times
Emphasizing that Deming, like Savair, was based on a pre-election union announcement that conditioned a waiver of initiation fees on a showing of pre-election union support
Moglia v. Geoghegan
394 U.S. 919 (1969) Cited 76 times
No. 1007. March 24, 1969. ORDER C.A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied. Isidore Englander for petitioner. Samuel J. Cohen for respondents. Reported below: 403 F. 2d 110.
International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988) Cited 119 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice
Temengil v. Trust Territory
496 U.S. 925 (1990) Cited 23 times
No. 89-1405. June 11, 1990. ORDER C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 881 F. 2d 647.
N.L.R.B. v. Haberman Const. Co.
641 F.2d 351 (5th Cir. 1981) Cited 103 times
Holding that the employer "manifested an intent to abide by the . . . contract by enjoying its benefits and abiding by its provisions"
Moglia v. Geoghegan
403 F.2d 110 (2d Cir. 1968) Cited 121 times
Holding that Section 302 was violated where "[a]ppellant conceded ... that at no time relevant ... there was a collective bargaining agreement or any written agreement" between the employer and the union
Raven Services Corp. v. N.L.R.B
315 F.3d 499 (5th Cir. 2002) Cited 11 times
Holding that after changes in economic circumstances suggested negotiations may be more fruitful, an impasse did not exist despite two years passing
N.L.R.B. v. Triple C Maintenance, Inc.
219 F.3d 1147 (10th Cir. 2000) Cited 12 times 1 Legal Analyses
Describing voluntary recognition under the National Labor Relations Act
N.L.R.B. v. Oklahoma Installation Co.
219 F.3d 1160 (10th Cir. 2000) Cited 2 times
Concluding that the contract language at issue did not clearly express the parties' intent, without addressing actual employee support

CAB Associates

18 Cited authorities

Holding that "[n]othing in the legislative history of § 8(f) indicates Congress intended employers to obtain free the benefits of stable labor costs, labor peace, and the use of the union hiring hall. Having had the music, he must pay the piper."

Emphasizing that Deming, like Savair, was based on a pre-election union announcement that conditioned a waiver of initiation fees on a showing of pre-election union support

Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice

Holding that the employer "manifested an intent to abide by the . . . contract by enjoying its benefits and abiding by its provisions"

Holding that Section 302 was violated where "[a]ppellant conceded ... that at no time relevant ... there was a collective bargaining agreement or any written agreement" between the employer and the union

Holding that after changes in economic circumstances suggested negotiations may be more fruitful, an impasse did not exist despite two years passing

Describing voluntary recognition under the National Labor Relations Act

Concluding that the contract language at issue did not clearly express the parties' intent, without addressing actual employee support