Upload a complaint or brief to quickly find on-point case law.
CARA A.I. uses the facts and legal issues in your document to find relevant authorities.
Drag a complaint or brief hereUpload a complaint or briefPDF documentWORD documentTXT documentOr, choose a document to uploadChoose DocumentSecure
Find on-point cases faster with CARA A.I.
§
C2G Ltd. Co.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 712 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Laurel Sand & Gravel, Inc. v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

    502 U.S. 814 (1991)   Cited 78 times

    No. 90-1805. October 7, 1991, OCTOBER TERM, 1991. C.A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 924 F. 2d 539.

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Vemco, Inc.

    989 F.2d 1468 (6th Cir. 1993)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that an employer's statement that unionization would result in a work shortage resulting in reduced hours or layoffs was a permissible, objective prediction, and thus protected speech under § 8(c), where nothing suggested that the expected work shortage "was within [the employer's] control" or that the employer "would implement a cutback in hours or a layoff solely on its own initiative for reasons unrelated to the economic necessity of adjusting to a shortage of work"

  4. Queen Mary Restaurants Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    560 F.2d 403 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 32 times
    Applying Medo to find that employer violated Act by meeting directly with employees to discuss increases in their seniority

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Rain-Ware, Inc.

    732 F.2d 1349 (7th Cir. 1984)   Cited 20 times
    Concluding that "[t]he timing of the layoffs and warehouse closing provides the strongest support for connecting anti-union sentiment with the layoffs," where the layoffs and warehouse closing closely followed a demand for union recognition

  6. Southwest Forest Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    841 F.2d 270 (9th Cir. 1988)   Cited 13 times

    Nos. 86-7137, 86-7177. Argued and Submitted July 6, 1987. Decided March 1, 1988. John H. Stephens, Cox, Castle Nicholson, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Howard E. Perlstein, NLRB, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, FLETCHER and POOLE, Circuit Judges. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: Southwest Forest Industries Inc. (South west) petitions for review of an unfair labor

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Citizens Hotel Company

    326 F.2d 501 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 29 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Citizens Hotel Co., 5 Cir., 326 F.2d 501, dealing with a somewhat similar unilateral termination of a bonus, we stated: "There was, therefore, an impermissible unilateral change constituting a failure to bargain."

  8. Golden Day Schools, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    644 F.2d 834 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 10 times
    In Golden Day Schools, 644 F.2d 834, the court noted that although the child care workers' leaflet to parents included harsh language and serious charges about the care of the children, it fell "woefully short of the malicious tone" that would justify a discharge under Jefferson Standard. Appellant correctly points out that the court in Golden Day Schools determined that the leaflet played no part in the discharge of the employees.

  9. Raytheon Company v. N.L.R.B

    326 F.2d 471 (1st Cir. 1964)   Cited 27 times

    No. 6126. Heard November 4, 1963. Decided January 7, 1964. Robert L. Molinar, Lexington, Mass., for petitioner. James C. Paras, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with whom Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Marion L. Griffin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Before WOODBURY, Chief Judge, and HARTIGAN and ALDRICH, Circuit Judges. ALDRICH, Circuit Judge. This case involving a finding

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Merrill Ring, Inc.

    731 F.2d 605 (9th Cir. 1984)   Cited 6 times
    Holding that a unilateral change to established practice violates § 8 and

  11. Section 160 - Prevention of unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 160   Cited 7,093 times   24 Legal Analyses
    Finding that the procedures for unfair labor practice cases mandated by R.C. 4117.12 and 4117.13 are substantively identical to those established in NLRA to govern unfair labor practice cases before NLRB