12 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Express Pub. Co.
312 U.S. 426 (1941) Cited 507 times 3 Legal AnalysesHolding that "the mere fact that a court has found that a defendant has committed an act in violation of a statute does not justify an injunction broadly to obey the statute"
Interstate Circuit v. U.S.
306 U.S. 208 (1939) Cited 514 times 7 Legal AnalysesHolding proof of an explicit agreement unnecessary to establish antitrust conspiracy among movie distributors where, "knowing that concerted action was contemplated and invited, the distributors gave their adherence to the scheme and participated in it"
Bourne v. N.L.R.B
332 F.2d 47 (2d Cir. 1964) Cited 93 times 1 Legal AnalysesIn Bourne, we held that interrogation which does not contain express threats is not an unfair labor practice unless certain "fairly severe standards" are met showing that the very fact of interrogation was coercive.
N.L.R.B. v. Joseph Antell, Inc.
358 F.2d 880 (1st Cir. 1966) Cited 26 timesIn Antell, the court stated that the smallness of a plant, or a staff, may be material as bearing on the knowledge on the part of the employer of an employee's union activities, but only to the extent that it may be shown to have made it likely that the employer observed, or otherwise learned about the activity in question.
Frito Company, Western Division v. N.L.R.B
330 F.2d 458 (9th Cir. 1964) Cited 26 timesNos. 18350, 18400. April 7, 1964. Hill, Farrer Burrill and Ray L. Johnson, Jr., Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner Frito Co. Daniel R. Thompson, Washington, D.C., for amicus curiae American Bottlers of Carbonated Beverages (No. 18350). Hill, Farrer Burrill, Carl M. Gould, and Stanley E. Tobin, Los Angeles, Cal., for amicus curiae American Research Merchandising Institute (No. 18350). Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel
American Newspaper Pub. v. N.L.R.B
193 F.2d 782 (7th Cir. 1951) Cited 38 timesIn American Newspaper, the complaint clearly described the action that was alleged to constitute the unfair labor practice.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Nabors
196 F.2d 272 (5th Cir. 1952) Cited 37 timesNo. 13526. April 29, 1952. Rehearing Denied June 6, 1952. Owsley Vose, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and David P. Findling, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Martin Dies, Sr., Lufkin, Tex., for respondent. Before HOLMES, BORAH, and STRUM, Circuit Judges. STRUM, Circuit Judge. `This is a petition to enforce, and a cross petition to set aside, an order of the National Labor Relations Board, issued April 19, 1950, pursuant to Sec. 10(c) of the National Labor Relations
N.L.R.B. v. Georgia Rug Mill
308 F.2d 89 (5th Cir. 1962) Cited 22 timesNo. 19223. September 18, 1962. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before BROWN, WISDOM and BELL, Circuit Judges. WISDOM, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order that the respondent, Georgia Rug Mill, cease violating Section 8(a)(1) of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. ยง
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Pecheur Lozenge Co.
209 F.2d 393 (2d Cir. 1953) Cited 27 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. Pecheur Lozenge Co., 2 Cir., 209 F.2d 393, 403, 404, it was held an unfair labor practice to insist that a strike be called off as a condition of bargaining.
Associated Home Bldr. of G. E. Bay v. N.L.R.B
352 F.2d 745 (9th Cir. 1965) Cited 13 timesIn Associated an association of builders claimed that a union's imposition of fines upon its members for exceeding a unilaterally imposed production quota violated the union members' section 7 rights and was therefore a section 8(b)(1)(A) unfair labor practice.
Rule 20 - Permissive Joinder of Parties
Fed. R. Civ. P. 20 Cited 11,962 times 22 Legal AnalysesGranting courts authority to "issue orders-including an order for separate trials."