C. P. Evans Food Stores, Inc.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Fainblatt

    306 U.S. 601 (1939)   Cited 281 times
    Upholding NLRA under Commerce Power
  2. Fed. Trade Com. v. Pac. Paper Assn

    273 U.S. 52 (1927)   Cited 147 times
    In Federal Trade Comm. v. Pacific Paper Assn., 273 U.S. 52, respondents, without presenting a cross petition for certiorari, sought a reversal of a distinct portion of the decree.
  3. Clyde-Mallory Lines v. Eglantine

    317 U.S. 395 (1943)   Cited 11 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 265. Argued November 20, 1942. Decided January 4, 1943. 1. Where a libel in rem is brought against a vessel, in private ownership and operation, to recover upon a cause of action arising out of a collision which occurred when the vessel was owned and operated by the Government, and the Government appears in the suit and assumes liability under § 4 of the Suits in Admiralty Act, the two-year limitation period of § 5 of that Act

  4. Weeks v. United States

    245 U.S. 618 (1918)   Cited 25 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 109. Submitted January 2, 1918. Decided February 4, 1918. The Food and Drugs Act of June 30, 1906, c. 3915, § 8, 34 Stat. 768, specifies and defines at least two kinds of "misbranding" — one where the article bears a false or misleading label, and the other where it is offered for sale under the distinctive name of another article. In either case, it is not the misbranding that is made unlawful, but the shipment or delivery for