§
C. Factotum, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Pierce v. Underwood

    487 U.S. 552 (1988)   Cited 9,417 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when Congress reenacts a statute without changing its language, and when there is no indication that “Congress thought it was doing anything ... except reenacting and making permanent” the earlier legislation, a court should not give weight to legislative history pertaining to the reenactment

  2. Commissioner, INS v. Jean

    496 U.S. 154 (1990)   Cited 2,659 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this inquiry applies to attorney's fees under the EAJA

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Tyler Business Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    695 F.2d 73 (4th Cir. 1982)   Cited 79 times
    Blocking recovery of attorneys fees in agency actions which were resolved prior to Act's effective date, although relying on a different interpretation of the Act

  5. Hess Mechanical Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    112 F.3d 146 (4th Cir. 1997)   Cited 13 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that agency cannot decline to conduct further inquiry and then plead its own failure to investigate as reason to conclude that its position was substantially justified

  6. Section 504 - Costs and fees of parties

    5 U.S.C. § 504   Cited 663 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Authorizing payment of attorney's fees by the Government when a party prevails in a federal agency adjudication