3 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Lion Oil Co.
352 U.S. 282 (1957) Cited 139 timesObserving that the court bears "a judicial responsibility to find that interpretation which can most fairly be said to be embedded in the statute, in the sense of being most harmonious with its scheme and with the general purposes that Congress manifested"
Lion Oil Company v. National Labor Rel. Board
245 F.2d 376 (8th Cir. 1957) Cited 7 timesNo. 15158. June 5, 1957. Jeff Davis, El Dorado, Ark. (B.L. Allen and H.D. Dickens, El Dorado, Ark., were with him on the brief), for petitioners. Duane Beeson, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief), for respondent. Before SANBORN, JOHNSEN and VOGEL, Circuit Judges. VOGEL, Circuit Judge. When this case
Lion Oil Company v. National Labor Rel. Board
221 F.2d 231 (8th Cir. 1955) Cited 4 timesNo. 15158. April 22, 1955. Jeff Davis, El Dorado, Ark. (B.L. Allen and H.D. Dickens, El Dorado, Ark., on the brief), for petitioner. Duane Beeson, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, Marcel Mallet-Prevost and Frederick U. Reel, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for respondent. Lindsay P. Walden and William E. Rentfro, Denver, Colo., filed brief for Oil Workers International Union, CIO, as amici curiæ. Before SANBORN, JOHNSEN and VOGEL, Circuit Judges. VOGEL, Circuit Judge. This case