§

C. C. Lang & Son, Inc.

102 N.L.R.B. 1667 (N.L.R.B. 1953)
C. C. Lang & Son, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dant

    344 U.S. 375 (1953)   Cited 24 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Dant, 344 U.S. 375, 73 S.Ct. 375, 97 L.Ed. 407, the legal effect of affidavits filed by union officers was successfully challenged in an enforcement proceeding in the Court of Appeals.

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Wiltse

    188 F.2d 917 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 27 times

    No. 11128. Decided March 23, 1951. As Amended on Rehearing June 1, 1951. Duane Beeson, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Bernard Dunau, and Duane Beeson, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. George Meader, Washington, D.C. (George Meader, Washington, D.C., John S. Dobson, Ann Arbor, Mich., on the brief), for respondent. Before SIMONS, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges. McALLISTER, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board filed its petition

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Vulcan Forging Co.

    188 F.2d 927 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 25 times
    In NLRB v. Vulcan Forging Co., 188 F.2d 927 (6th Cir. 1951), the court held that in determining whether the NLRB had jurisdiction over a company which sold all of its output to Ford Motor Company, judicial notice could be taken of the interstate activities of Ford.

  4. West Texas Utilities v. National Labor R. BD

    184 F.2d 233 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 22 times
    In West Texas Utilities Co. v. National Labor R. Bd., 87 U.S.App.D.C. 179, 184 F.2d 233, 239, the District of Columbia Court said: "The failure of union officers to comply with 9(h) does not in any way relieve an employer of the paramount obligation to bargain collectively in good faith.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Red Rock Co.

    187 F.2d 76 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 17 times

    No. 13375. February 15, 1951. Rehearing Denied March 9, 1951. Bernard Dunau, Atty., A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. M.E. Kilpatrick, Atlanta, Georgia, for respondents. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and BORAH, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. In its general aspects this is an ordinary proceeding by the Board for the enforcement of one of its remedial

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Louisville Ref. Co.

    102 F.2d 678 (6th Cir. 1939)   Cited 26 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Louisville Refining Co. 102 F.2d 678, 680, certiorari denied sub nomine Louisville Refining Co. v. National Labor Relations Board, 308 U.S. 568, it was held that it was established that a union had actually been designated as the bargaining representative of a majority of the employees involved, by the fact that signed applications for membership in that union had been executed by them.

  7. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Am. Thread Co.

    198 F.2d 137 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 4 times

    No. 13883. July 31, 1952. Fannie M. Boyls, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, D.P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Frank A. Constangy, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges. RUSSELL, Circuit Judge. The order sought to be enforced by the National Labor Relations Board by this proceeding is directed against The American Thread Company, Tallapoosa, Georgia. Enforcement

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Dant

    195 F.2d 299 (9th Cir. 1952)   Cited 4 times

    No. 12985. March 20, 1952. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, Norton J. Come, Morris A. Solomon, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. R.S. Smethurst, R.S. Haslam, Washington, D.C., John T. Casey and Casey, Kriesien Palmer, all of Portland, Or., for respondent. Before MATHEWS, STEPHENS and BONE, Circuit Judges. MATHEWS, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board

  9. National Labor Rel. Board v. Gittlin Bag Co.

    196 F.2d 158 (4th Cir. 1952)   Cited 3 times

    No. 6391. Argued April 8, 1952. Decided April 23, 1952. Ruth V. Reel, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, and Arnold Ordman, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board all of Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. James M. Roberts, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER, and DOBIE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This is a petition

  10. National Labor Relations Bd. v. I.F. Sales Co.

    188 F.2d 931 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 3 times

    No. 11216. March 23, 1951. George J. Bott, Washington, D.C., John A. Hull. Jr., and Philip Fusco, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner. R.F. Vandemark and R.W. Vandemark, Elyria, Ohio, R.W. Vandemark, Elyria, Ohio, for respondent. Before ALLEN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The above cause coming on to be heard on the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel; and it appearing that the findings of the National Labor Relations Board that employee