§

C. A. Roberts Co.

156 N.L.R.B. 138 (N.L.R.B. 1965)
C. A. Roberts Co.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    340 U.S. 474 (1951)   Cited 9,674 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that court may not "displace the Board's choice between two fairly conflicting views, even though the court would justifiably have made a different choice had the matter been before it de novo "

  2. Labor Board v. Pittsburgh S.S. Co.

    337 U.S. 656 (1949)   Cited 88 times
    Holding "total rejection of an opposed view cannot of itself impugn the integrity or competence of a trier of fact"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Robbins Tire

    161 F.2d 798 (5th Cir. 1947)   Cited 35 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Robbins Tire Rubber Co., 5 Cir., 161 F.2d 798, 800, where the proportion of the witnesses against, to those for, the examiner's conclusions was far greater than it is here, we held exactly to the contrary of this contention.

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Taitel

    261 F.2d 1 (7th Cir. 1958)   Cited 16 times

    No. 12335. October 30, 1958. Rehearing Denied December 22, 1958. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Sheldon M. Charone, Atty., Chicago, Ill., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fannie M. Boyls, Robert J. Wilson, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. George Rose, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge, HASTINGS, Circuit Judge, and WHAM, District Judge. HASTINGS, Circuit Judge. This case comes before

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters

    230 F.2d 256 (1st Cir. 1956)   Cited 3 times

    No. 5037. Heard December 6, 1955. Decided February 28, 1956. Harold Kowal, Field Atty., Boston, Mass., with whom Theophil C. Kammholz, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Samuel M. Singer and Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C., Attys., were on brief, for petitioner. Sidney W. Wernick, Portland, Me., with whom Berman, Berman Wernick, Portland, Me., were on brief, for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Howard-Cooper Corp.

    259 F.2d 558 (9th Cir. 1958)   Cited 1 times

    No. 15937. October 6, 1958. Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Thomas J. McDermott, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., Louis S. Penfield, Atty., NLRB, San Francisco, Cal., for petitioner. J.P. Stirling, Portland, Or., for respondent. Before HEALY, FEE and HAMLIN, Circuit Judges. HAMLIN, Circuit Judge. There is before this Court a petition of the National Labor Relations Board to enforce an order issued against Howard-Cooper Corporation