C. A. Batson Co.

11 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 471 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"
  2. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 318 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."
  3. Katz v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    196 F.2d 411 (9th Cir. 1952)   Cited 26 times
    Continuing unfair labor practice
  4. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Bird Mach. Co.

    161 F.2d 589 (1st Cir. 1947)   Cited 20 times

    No. 4219. May 20, 1947. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against Bird Machine Company for an enforcement of an order of the board. Decree enforcing order of board granted. Owsley Vose, N.L.R.B., of Washington, D.C. (Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Gen. Counsel, Morris P. Glushein, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frances Lopinsky, all of Washington, D.C., of counsel), for petitioner

  5. National Labor Rel. Board v. Acme Mattress Co.

    192 F.2d 524 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 13 times

    No. 10441. November 7, 1951. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, and A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Gerald F. Krassa, Washington, D.C., National Labor Relations Board. Isadore Katz, David Jaffe, New York City, for respondent. Before KERNER, FINNEGAN and LINDLEY, Circuit Judges. FINNEGAN, Circuit Judge. This is a petition by the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order entered on October 18, 1950, against respondents

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Radio Officers' Union of Commercial Telegraphers Union

    196 F.2d 960 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 10 times

    No. 158, Docket 22191. Argued February 7, 1952. Decided May 6, 1952. George J. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, and Owsley Vose and Willis S. Ryza, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, and Paul Kuelthau, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Butter Silverman, New York City, Abner H. Silverman, Emanuel Butter and Alexander C. Russotto, all of New York City, of counsel, for respondent. Before SWAN, Chief Judge

  7. International Un., Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    184 F.2d 392 (D.C. Cir. 1950)   Cited 5 times

    No. 10302. Argued May 16, 1950. Decided July 17, 1950. Messrs. Welly K. Hopkins, Harrison Combs, Willard P. Owens, all of Washington, D.C., T.C. Townsend and M.E. Boiarsky, Charleston, W.Va., were on the brief for petitioners. Miss Fannie M. Boyls, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, of the Bar of the Supreme Court of Texas, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, was on the brief, for respondent. Before

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.

    193 F.2d 324 (9th Cir. 1951)   Cited 3 times

    No. 12775. November 30, 1951. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Owsley Vose and Melvin Pollack, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Barzee, Leedy Keane and Hugh L. Barzee, Portland, Or., for respondents Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. and others. Green, Landye Richardson, Burl L. Green, J. Robert Patterson and Donald S. Richardson, Portland, Or., for respondents

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Peerless Quarries

    193 F.2d 419 (10th Cir. 1951)

    No. 4303. December 31, 1951. Bernard Dunau, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers and Ruth V. Russell, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. John J. Manning, Kansas City, Mo., (Clif Langsdale, Kansas City, Mo., on the brief), for respondents. Before BRATTON, HUXMAN and PICKETT, Circuit Judges. PICKETT, Circuit Judge. By this proceeding the National Labor Relations Board seeks the enforcement of its order of January 10, 1951, directed to the respondents,

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Schaefer-Hitchcock

    131 F.2d 1004 (9th Cir. 1942)   Cited 7 times

    No. 10118. November 12, 1942. Upon Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of an order issued by the Board in proceeding against the Schaefer-Hitchcock Company. Order enforced. Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Associate Gen. Counsel, Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Morris P. Glushien, David Findling, and William T. Whitsett, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, all of

  11. Section 233:65 - Admissibility of declaration of decedent

    Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 233 § 65   Cited 26 times

    In any action or other civil judicial proceeding, a declaration of a deceased person shall not be inadmissible in evidence as hearsay or as private conversation between husband and wife, as the case may be, if the court finds that it was made in good faith and upon the personal knowledge of the declarant. Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 233, § 65