§

BUY-LOW MARKET, INC.

367 NLRB No. 1 (N.L.R.B. 2018)
BUY-LOW MARKET, INC.

10 Cited authorities

  1. EPIC Sys. Corp. v. Lewis

    138 S. Ct. 1612 (2018)   Cited 969 times   169 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, under Concepcion , "courts may not allow a contract defense to reshape traditional individualized arbitration" and "a rule seeking to declare individualized arbitration proceedings off limits" is preempted by the FAA

  2. J.I. Case Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 332 (1944)   Cited 457 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the result of a collective bargaining agreement is not "a contract of employment except in rare cases; no one has a job by reason of it and no obligation to any individual ordinarily comes into existence from it alone"

  3. Morris v. Ernst & Young, LLP

    834 F.3d 975 (9th Cir. 2016)   Cited 147 times   52 Legal Analyses
    Holding arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims violate the NLRA and fall within the FAA's saving clause

  4. D.R. Horton, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013)   Cited 141 times   145 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration agreement that prohibited an employee from pursuing claims collectively did not violate the NLRA and must be enforced

  5. Lewis v. Epic Sys. Corp.

    823 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 2016)   Cited 124 times   58 Legal Analyses
    Holding that such waivers violate the Fair Labor Standards Act

  6. Nat. Licorice Co. v. Labor Bd.

    309 U.S. 350 (1940)   Cited 315 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that requiring employees to sign individual contracts waiving their rights to self-organization and collective bargaining violates § 8 of the NLRA

  7. Murphy Oil United States, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    808 F.3d 1013 (5th Cir. 2015)   Cited 66 times   103 Legal Analyses
    Upholding its earlier holding in D.R. Horton, Inc. v. NLRB , 737 F.3d 344 (5th Cir. 2013), that arbitration provisions mandating individual arbitration of employment-related claims do not violate the NLRA and are enforceable under the FAA

  8. O'Neill v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    509 U.S. 904 (1993)   Cited 18 times
    Declining to apply the rule where "all the relevant facts were known. It was the meaning of the law that was misunderstood."

  9. Local 32B-32J Service Emp. Intern. v. N.L.R.B

    982 F.2d 845 (2d Cir. 1993)   Cited 8 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 24, 81, Dockets 92-4039, 92-4055. Argued September 1, 1992. Decided January 7, 1993. Ira A. Sturm, New York City (Manning, Raab, Dealy Sturm, of counsel), for Local 32B-32J, Service Employees Intern. Union, AFL-CIO. Martin Gringer, Garden City, N Y (Franklin Gringer, P.C., of counsel), for Field Bridge Associates and Rachel Bridge Corp. Michael J. Gan, N.L.R.B., Washington, DC (Jerry M. Hunter, Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel), for N.L.R.B. Petition for review

  10. N.L.R.B. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

    677 F.2d 421 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 5 times

    No. 81-1070. May 10, 1982. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Peter Winkler, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. W. Bruce Baird, Matthew R. Westfall, Baird, Kirven, Westfall Talbott, Louisville, Ky., James D. Crawford, Schnader, Harrison, Segal Lewis, Philadelphia, Pa., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before ENGEL, Circuit Judge, PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge, and DUMBAULD, District Judge. Honorable Edward Dumbauld, Senior Judge, United