4 Cited authorities
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.
465 U.S. 822 (1984) Cited 206 times 9 Legal AnalysesHolding that a "lone employee's invocation of a right grounded in his collective-bargaining agreement is . . . a concerted activity in a very real sense" because the employee is in effect reminding his employer of the power of the group that brought about the agreement and that could be reharnessed if the employer refuses to respect the employee's objection
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 358 times 46 Legal AnalysesHolding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
OPW Fueling Components v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
443 F.3d 490 (6th Cir. 2006) Cited 6 timesNos. 04-2563, 05-1083. Argued: November 28, 2005. Decided and Filed: April 6, 2006. Petition for Rehearing Denied En Banc, July 28, 2006. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. ARGUED: Michael W. Hawkins, Dinsmore Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Petitioner. Heather S. Beard, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. ON BRIEF: Michael W. Hawkins, Colleen P. Lewis, Dinsmore Shohl, Cincinnati, Ohio, for Petitioner. Heather S. Beard, Aileen A. Armstrong, Jill A. Griffin
City Disposal Systems v. N.L.R.B
766 F.2d 969 (6th Cir. 1985) Cited 1 timesNo. 81-1406. July 9, 1985. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied August 26, 1985. Theodore R. Opperwall, argued, Dickinson, Wright, McKean, Cudlip Moon, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Howard Perlstein, argued, Washington, D.C., Harris Berman, Compliance Officer, N.L.R.B., Detroit, Mich., for respondent. Before LIVELY, Chief Judge, and JONES and MILBURN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The National Labor Relations Board (the Board) once again