Bush Hog, Inc.
5 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. Katz
369 U.S. 736 (1962) Cited 710 times 29 Legal AnalysesHolding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
Kirschbaum Co. v. Walling
316 U.S. 517 (1942) Cited 523 timesHolding that maintenance workers of clothing manufacturer were covered under the FLSA
May Stores Co. v. Labor Board
326 U.S. 376 (1945) Cited 257 timesRequiring "a clear determination by the Board of an attitude of opposition to the purposes of the Act to protect the rights of employees generally"
Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
321 U.S. 678 (1944) Cited 269 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate ยง 8
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bush Hog, Inc.
405 F.2d 755 (5th Cir. 1968) Cited 14 timesNo. 25593. December 26, 1968. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Arthur A. Horowitz, Warren M. Davison, Attys., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. William F. Gardner, J. Michael Rediker, Cabaniss, Johnston, Gardner Clark, Birmingham, Ala., Sam Earle Hobbs, Craig, Hobbs Hain, Selma, Ala., for respondent, Bush Hog, Inc. Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and RIVES and McENTEE, Circuit Judges. Of the First Circuit, sitting