§
Bush Hog, Inc.

17 Cited authorities

  1. Hendrix Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    321 F.2d 100 (5th Cir. 1963)   Cited 91 times
    Permitting the Board to consider the employer's clear expression of opposition to the union as background in order to determine motivation for management's conduct

  2. Surprenant Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    341 F.2d 756 (6th Cir. 1965)   Cited 60 times
    In Surprenant Mfg. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 341 F.2d 756 (6th Cir. 1965) this Court approved as non-threatening, language of the employer which was much stronger than that used in the present case.

  3. Marshfield Steel Company v. N.L.R.B

    324 F.2d 333 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 38 times

    No. 17315. November 20, 1963. Ransom A. Ellis, Jr., of Walker, Daniel, Clampett, Rittershouse Ellis, Springfield, Mo., made argument for the petitioner and filed brief. Leo N. McGuire, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., made argument for the respondent and Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief. Before VOGEL and MATTHES, Circuit Judges, and

  4. Daniel Construction Company v. N.L.R.B

    341 F.2d 805 (4th Cir. 1965)   Cited 36 times
    In Daniel Construction Co. v. N.L.R.B., 341 F.2d 805, cert. denied, 382 U.S. 831, 86 S.Ct. 70, 15 L.Ed.2d 75 (1965), this court considered the identical question presented here. The Board, having found that the company had violated section 8(a) (1) during the course of an election campaign and that such conduct had interfered with the employees' free choice, set the election aside, and ordered that a new election be held. The company sought review of both matters in this court.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Big Three Welding Equipment Company

    359 F.2d 77 (5th Cir. 1966)   Cited 27 times
    Holding that NLRB could not order reinstatement of employees who committed theft

  6. Time-O-Matic, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    264 F.2d 96 (7th Cir. 1959)   Cited 32 times

    No. 12424. March 5, 1959. Edward B. Miller, Merrill Shepard, Willis S. Ryza, Chicago, Ill., for petitioner, Time-O-Matic, Inc. Pope Ballard, Chicago, Ill., of counsel, for petitioner. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Fred S. Landess, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge and HASTINGS and PARKINSON, Circuit Judges. HASTINGS, Circuit Judge. Petitioner

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Bin-Dicator Company

    356 F.2d 210 (6th Cir. 1966)   Cited 20 times
    In Bin-Dicator, the Court gave "special examination" to the reinstatement order because the Board order conflicted with that of its trial examiner.

  8. Martin Sprocket Gear Company v. N.L.R.B

    329 F.2d 417 (5th Cir. 1964)   Cited 17 times

    No. 19463. March 19, 1964. Rehearing Denied April 22, 1964. Winfred Hooper, Jr., George Q. McGown, III, R.W. Decker, McGown, Godfrey, Logan Decker, Fort Worth, Tex., for petitioner. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Janet Kohn, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before BROWN and BELL, Circuit Judges, and

  9. Bauer Welding Metal Fabricators v. N.L.R.B

    358 F.2d 766 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 12 times

    No. 18166. April 14, 1966. Thomas M. Vogt of Felhaber, Larson, Fenlon Vogt, St. Paul, Minn., made argument for the petitioner and filed brief with John W. Edstrom, St. Paul, Minn. George H. Cohen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., made argument for the N.L.R.B. and filed brief with Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. Before VOGEL

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Herman Wilson Lumber Company

    355 F.2d 426 (8th Cir. 1966)   Cited 11 times

    No. 18022. January 31, 1966. Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., made argument for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Julius Rosenbaum, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., were with him on the brief. Joseph Alton Jenkins, Dallas, Tex., made argument for respondent; Joseph Alton Jenkins Associates, Dallas, Tex., and Gaines N. Houston, Little Rock, Ark., were with him on the brief. Before MATTHES and GIBSON, Circuit Judges, and LARSON

  11. Section 2000e-2 - Unlawful employment practices

    42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2   Cited 29,123 times   171 Legal Analyses
    Adopting case law prior to June 4, 1989, “with respect to the concept of ‘alternative employment practice’ ”