§

Burke Oldsmobile, Inc.

128 N.L.R.B. 79 (N.L.R.B. 1960)
Burke Oldsmobile, Inc.

7 Cited authorities

  1. Cleaver-Brooks Mfg. Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    264 F.2d 637 (7th Cir. 1959)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that a strike protesting the replacement of a supervisor where the evidence showed the strike to be based on mere personal antipathy toward a new foreman was unprotected activity.

  2. Hoover Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    191 F.2d 380 (6th Cir. 1951)   Cited 18 times

    No. 11223. July 9, 1951. Donald K. Merwin, Richard G. McCuskey, Canton, Ohio (Donald K. Merwin, Richard G. McCuskey, Canton, Ohio, on the brief, Black, McCuskey, Souers Arbaugh, Canton, Ohio, of counsel), for petitioner. Herschel Kriger, Canton, Ohio (Herschel Kriger, Canton, Ohio, on the brief), for charging parties amicus curiae. Isadore J. Gromfine, Washington, D.C. (George J. Bott, David Findling, A Norman Somers, Owsley Vose, and Arnold Ordman, all of Washington, D.C. on the brief), for respondent

  3. Elastic Stop Nut Corp. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    142 F.2d 371 (8th Cir. 1944)   Cited 24 times

    No. 12740. May 1, 1944. Petition to Review Order of National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the Elastic Stop Nut Corporation to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board based on the board's findings and conclusion that the petitioner was engaging in unfair labor practices in violation of the National Labor Relations Act, wherein the board prayed for enforcement of its order. Enforcement ordered as prayed by the Board. Charles E. Whittaker, of Kansas City, Mo. (Henry

  4. Harrison Sheet Steel v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    194 F.2d 407 (7th Cir. 1952)   Cited 15 times
    In Harrison Sheet Steel Co. v. N.L.R.B., 7 Cir., 194 F.2d 407, the company recognized a union which had just lost an election, and obviously did not represent a majority of the employees, when there were two other unions trying to organize the plant.

  5. Ohio Ferro-Alloys v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    213 F.2d 646 (6th Cir. 1954)   Cited 8 times

    No. 11943. June 17, 1954. Robert N. Rybolt, Canton, Ohio, John G. Ketterer, Day, Cope, Ketterer, Raley Wright, Canton, Ohio, on the brief, for petitioner. Fannie M. Boyls, Washington, D.C., George J. Bott, David P. Findling, A. Norman Somers, Thomas R. Haley, Washington, D.C., on the brief, for respondent. Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and MILLER, Circuit Judges. MARTIN, Circuit Judge. Ohio Ferro-Alloys Corporation has petitioned this court to review a decision and order of the National Labor Relations

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Electronics Equip

    194 F.2d 650 (2d Cir. 1952)   Cited 7 times

    No. 120, Docket 22136. Argued December 13, 1951. Decided February 18, 1952. The Board found Electronics guilty of an unfair labor practice in discharging Penchansky for his participation in the writing and sending of two letters to Electronics' customers. The Board's decision and order are reported in 94 N.L.R.B. No. 19. The letters read as follows: "Wholesale Warehouse Workers Union Local 65 "13 Astor Place, New York 3, N Y "Telephone: Oregon 3-5120 "July 8, 1949 "Dear Friend: "This is an appeal

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Electronics Equip

    205 F.2d 296 (2d Cir. 1953)

    No. 292, Docket 22136. Submitted June 1, 1953. Decided June 19, 1953. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Ashe Rifkin, New York City (George Rifkin, New York City, of counsel), for respondent. Before CHASE, CLARK, and FRANK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The issues presented by this petition are stated in our previous opinion. National Labor Relations Board v. Electronics Equipment Co., 2 Cir., 194 F.2d 650. In supplemental proceedings