§

Burkart Foam, Inc.

283 N.L.R.B. 351 (N.L.R.B. 1987)
Burkart Foam, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  2. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  3. Pepsi-Cola Bottling Co., Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    659 F.2d 87 (8th Cir. 1981)   Cited 26 times
    In Pepsi Cola Bottling Co. v. NLRB, 659 F.2d 87 (8th Cir. 1981) (Pepsi Cola), the union initially rejected the offer and three weeks passed between offer and acceptance. During the three-week interval, the employer met with the union for several bargaining sessions but did not expressly withdraw its offer.

  4. Georgia Kraft Co., Woodkraft Div. v. N.L.R.B

    696 F.2d 931 (11th Cir. 1983)   Cited 12 times

    No. 81-7852. January 24, 1983. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied April 8, 1983. Powell, Goldstein, Frazer, Murphy, J. Roy Weathersby, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner, cross-respondent. James Callear, Washington, D.C., for respondent, cross-petitioner. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before KRAVITCH, HATCHETT and CLARK, Circuit Judges. HATCHETT, Circuit Judge: In this case we decide that substantial evidence supports enforcement

  5. United Aircraft Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    434 F.2d 1198 (2d Cir. 1970)   Cited 20 times
    Undertaking extensive review of facts prior to concluding that inadequacy of alternative methods of communication rendered disclosure of employees' names and addresses necessary