§
Bulletin Co.

12 Cited authorities

  1. National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass'n v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    386 U.S. 612 (1967)   Cited 392 times
    Holding that union employees' refusal to install third-party manufacturer's product was not prohibited under § 158(b)(B), because it was an action "pressuring the [union members'] employer for agreements regulating relations between [the employer] and his own employees"

  2. Radio Officers v. Labor Board

    347 U.S. 17 (1954)   Cited 470 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "[t]he policy of the Act is to insulate employees' jobs from their organizational rights"

  3. Labor Board v. News Syndicate Co.

    365 U.S. 695 (1961)   Cited 22 times
    In NLRB v. News Syndicate Co., 365 U.S. 695, 81 S.Ct. 849, 6 L.Ed.2d 29 (1961), where the bargaining unit included supervisors, the NLRB had found that both the employer and the union had committed unfair labor practices by operating an unlawful closed shop and preferential hiring system.

  4. Collins Aikman Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    383 F.2d 722 (4th Cir. 1967)   Cited 22 times
    Paying employee $7 to be observer at election is an "unreasonable or excessive economic inducement" potentially influencing other employees and is ground to set aside election

  5. N.L.R.B. v. SuCrest Corporation

    409 F.2d 765 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 6 times

    Nos. 114-116, Dockets 32433-32435. Argued October 30, 1968. Decided March 24, 1969. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel and Iran D. Lanoff, Atty., NLRB, on the brief), for petitioner. Morton L. Deitch, New York City (Stroock Stroock Lavan and David L. Finkelman, New York City, on the brief), for respondent SuCrest Corp. Joel Field, New York City (Schulman, Abarbanel Kroner and Howard

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Zoe Chemical Co.

    406 F.2d 574 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 6 times

    No. 29, Docket 31989. Argued October 9, 1968. Decided January 13, 1969. William J. Avrutis, Atty., NLRB (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Charles R. Katz, New York City (Katz Wolchok, New York City, on the brief), for respondent Zoe Chemical Co., Inc. Before FRIENDLY, ANDERSON and FEINBERG, Circuit Judges. FEINBERG, Circuit Judge: Over five

  7. Minnesota Milk Company v. N.L.R.B

    314 F.2d 761 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 7 times

    No. 16966. March 7, 1963. Thomas M. Vogt, St. Paul, Minn., made argument for petitioner; Felhaber, Larson Fenlon, St. Paul, Minn., with him on the brief. Hans J. Lehmann, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., made argument for respondent; Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Melvin J. Welles, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with him on the brief. Donald Savelkoul, Minneapolis, Minn., made argument for intervenor and

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Lexington Electric Products Co.

    283 F.2d 54 (3d Cir. 1960)   Cited 6 times

    No. 13176. Argued June 9, 1960. Decided September 29, 1960. Richard H. Frank, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Harold Stern, New York City (Norman Rothfeld, New York City, on the brief), for Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, and Julius Helfer. Stephen

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Bechtel Corporation

    328 F.2d 28 (10th Cir. 1964)   Cited 3 times

    No. 7034. February 25, 1964. Rehearing Denied April 30, 1964. Solomon I. Hirsh, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Stuart Broad, Washington, D.C., with him on brief), for petitioner. Gordon Johnson, of Thelen, Marrin, Johnson Bridges, San Francisco, Cal. (Paul R. Haerle, and Peter V. Brucher, San Francisco, Cal., with him on brief), for respondent Bechtel Corp. Harry H. Craig, St. Louis, Mo. (Gibson

  10. Skouras Theatres Corp. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    361 F.2d 826 (3d Cir. 1966)   Cited 1 times

    Nos. 15662, 15671. Argued May 24, 1966. Decided June 7, 1966. Louis M. Weber, New York City (Wolf, Baumann Burstein, Jersey City, N.J., on the brief), for petitioner Skouras Theatres Corp. James A. Major, Hackensack, N.J. (Major Major, Hackensack, N.J., on the brief), for petitioner International Alliance, etc., Local 642. Herman M. Levy, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore