Bulkmatic Transport Co.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"
  2. Contempo Design v. N.E. Il. Carpenters

    226 F.3d 535 (7th Cir. 2000)   Cited 48 times
    Holding termination provision of CBA should be strictly construed because “the terms of a collective bargaining agreement are to be enforced strictly when the terms are unambiguous”
  3. Young v. North Drury Lane Productions, Inc.

    80 F.3d 203 (7th Cir. 1996)   Cited 17 times
    Finding that the district court had correctly concluded that, because neither party had provided written notice prior to the expiration of the 1993 collective bargaining agreement, the automatic renewal provision went into effect and the parties became bound to the 1995 collective bargaining agreement
  4. Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    309 F.3d 578 (9th Cir. 2002)   Cited 10 times
    Referring to "mandatory subjects"
  5. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,317 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355