Building and Construction Trades Council, ETC.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Carpenters' Union v. Labor Board

    357 U.S. 93 (1958)   Cited 201 times
    Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act
  2. Southern S.S. Co. v. Labor Board

    316 U.S. 31 (1942)   Cited 160 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding an abuse of discretion where the National Labor Relations Board sought to fulfill one congressional objective but “wholly ignore[d] other and equally important Congressional objectives”
  3. Labor Board v. I. M. Electric Co.

    318 U.S. 9 (1943)   Cited 108 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Indiana Michigan Electric Co., 318 U.S. 9, at page 28, 63 S.Ct. 394, at page 405, 87 L.Ed. 579, the Supreme Court stated the general fundamental principles with respect to findings of fact by the Board, saying that the reviewing court is given discretion to see that before a party's rights are foreclosed his case has been fairly heard, and "Findings cannot be said to have been fairly reached unless material evidence which might impeach, as well as that which will support, its findings, is heard and weighed."
  4. Superior Derrick Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    273 F.2d 891 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 37 times

    Nos. 17619, 17512. January 21, 1960. C. Paul Barker, Dodd, Hirsch, Barker Meunier, New Orleans, La., Seymour W. Miller, Brooklyn, N.Y., of counsel, for Seafarers' International Union of North America, and others. Bernard Marcus, Deutsch, Kerrigan Stiles, New Orleans, La., Eberhard P. Deutsch, New Orleans, La., of counsel, for Superior Derrick Corp. Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Norton

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Plumbers Un. of Nassau Cty

    299 F.2d 497 (2d Cir. 1962)   Cited 22 times
    Enforcing the order of 131 N.L.R.B. 1243
  6. Amalgamated Meat Cutters, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    237 F.2d 20 (D.C. Cir. 1956)   Cited 14 times

    Nos. 12891, 12931. Argued March 14, 1956. Decided June 22, 1956. Rehearing Denied September 13, 1956. Petition for Rehearing Denied September 13, 1956. Second Petition for Rehearing Denied October 8, 1956. Petition for Rehearing In Banc Denied October 8, 1956. Mr. Mozart G. Ratner, Chicago, Ill., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Illinois, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Messrs. Martin F. O'Donoghue and Thomas X. Dunn, Washington, D.C., were on the briefs, for petitioner in No

  7. NATIONAL LABOR REL. BD. v. UNITED BHD., CARP

    261 F.2d 166 (7th Cir. 1958)   Cited 11 times

    No. 12279. November 10, 1958. Thomas J. McDermott, Associate Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., Jerome D. Fenton, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Franklin C. Milliken, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Lester Asher, Chicago, Ill., Francis X. Ward, William A. McGowan, Indianapolis, Ind., for respondents. Before DUFFY, Chief Judge, and FINNEGAN and SCHNACKENBERG, Circuit Judges. SCHNACKENBERG

  8. Rule 12 - Defenses and Objections: When and How Presented; Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; Consolidating Motions; Waiving Defenses; Pretrial Hearing

    Fed. R. Civ. P. 12   Cited 359,902 times   954 Legal Analyses
    Granting the court discretion to exclude matters outside the pleadings presented to the court in defense of a motion to dismiss