§

Builders, Woodworkers & Millwrights Local 1 (Glens Falls Contractors)

341 N.L.R.B. 448 (N.L.R.B. 2004)
Builders, Woodworkers & Millwrights Local 1 (Glens Falls Contractors)

3 Cited authorities

  1. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  2. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Stockton Door Co., Inc.

    547 F.2d 489 (9th Cir. 1976)   Cited 1 times

    No. 75-3181. December 23, 1976. Aileen Armstrong, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. James B. Atkinson, Stockton, Cal., for respondent. Before ELY and TRASK, Circuit Judges, and ORRICK, District Judge. Honorable William H. Orrick, Jr., United States District Judge, San Francisco, California, sitting by designation. PER CURIAM: The petitioning Board, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 160(e), has applied for enforcement of its order issued against the Respondent. The Board's Decision and Order is