Buffalo Newspaper Guild, The, Local 26, and The Newspaper Guild, AFL-CIO-CLC (Buffalo Courier Express, Inc.)

13 Cited authorities

  1. Edison Co. v. Labor Board

    305 U.S. 197 (1938)   Cited 19,302 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a Board order cannot be grounded in hearsay
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Industrial Union of Marine & Shipbuilding Workers of America

    391 U.S. 418 (1968)   Cited 215 times
    Holding that union could not expel member because he filed unfair labor practice charge against it without first exhausting internal remedies as provided in union constitution
  3. Nash v. Florida Industrial Comm'n

    389 U.S. 235 (1967)   Cited 141 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding preempted an administrative policy interpreting presumably valid state unemployment insurance law exception for "labor disputes" to include proceedings under NLRB complaints
  4. Scofield v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    394 U.S. 423 (1969)   Cited 117 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding union rule, enforceable by fines and expulsion, imposing limitation on immediate pay that members could receive for piecework because Court found no "impairment of statutory labor policy"
  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Boeing Co.

    412 U.S. 67 (1973)   Cited 49 times
    Upholding position that Board lacked power to review reasonableness of union disciplinary rule imposed on members who crossed picket line
  6. Willapoint Oysters v. Ewing

    174 F.2d 676 (9th Cir. 1949)   Cited 130 times
    In Willapoint Oysters v. Ewing (9th Cir. 1949) 174 F.2d 676, cert. denied 338 U.S. 860, 70 S.Ct. 101, 94 L.Ed. 527, rehearing den. 339 U.S. 945, 70 S.Ct. 793, 94 L.Ed. 1360, this Court relied upon Consolidated Edison to hold that hearsay alone, or even hearsay corroborated by a mere scintilla could never provide substantial evidence to support an administrative finding.
  7. Ekanem v. Health Hosp. Corp. of Marion Cty

    589 F.2d 316 (7th Cir. 1978)   Cited 37 times
    In Ekanem v. Health Hosp. Corp., 589 F.2d 316 (7th Cir. 1978) (" Ekanem I"), we reversed the district court's grant of a preliminary injunction enjoining retaliatory acts and ordering the defendant Health and Hospital Corporation to reinstate Ekanem on the grounds that the plaintiffs had failed to show irreparable harm and a substantial likelihood of success on the merits.
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Wilson Freight Co.

    604 F.2d 712 (1st Cir. 1979)   Cited 14 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Wilson Freight Co., 604 F.2d 712, 722-723, 726-727 (1st Cir. 1979), for example, the discharged employee had engaged in gross misconduct amounting to clear disloyalty and had undertaken complaint activity exceeding his contractual authority as a shop steward.
  9. N.L.R.B. v. Inter. Broth. of Boilermakers

    581 F.2d 473 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 5 times
    In Boilermakers, the union official filed a charge against the company in derogation of the grievance procedure in the collective bargaining agreement.
  10. Hiladelphia Moving Picture Mach. v. N.L.R.B

    382 F.2d 598 (3d Cir. 1967)   Cited 7 times

    No. 16119. Argued May 2, 1967. Decided August 1, 1967. James J. Leyden, Philadelphia, Pa. (Herbert G. Keene, Jr., Schnader, Harrison, Segal Lewis, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner. Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Linda R. Sher, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for respondent. Before McLAUGHLIN, HASTIE and SEITZ, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT

  11. Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

    29 U.S.C. § 151   Cited 5,092 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"
  12. Section 556 - Hearings; presiding employees; powers and duties; burden of proof; evidence; record as basis of decision

    5 U.S.C. § 556   Cited 909 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Specifying that presiding officers may either be the agency, a member of the body that comprises the agency, i.e., a commissioner, or an ALJ