§

Bud's Woodfire Oven LLC d/b/a Ava's Pizzeria

05-CA-194577 (N.L.R.B. Nov. 6, 2019)
Bud's Woodfire Oven LLC d/b/a Ava's Pizzeria

6 Cited authorities

  1. Pierce v. Underwood

    487 U.S. 552 (1988)   Cited 9,295 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding that when Congress reenacts a statute without changing its language, and when there is no indication that “Congress thought it was doing anything ... except reenacting and making permanent” the earlier legislation, a court should not give weight to legislative history pertaining to the reenactment

  2. Commissioner, INS v. Jean

    496 U.S. 154 (1990)   Cited 2,627 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that this inquiry applies to attorney's fees under the EAJA

  3. Hess Mechanical Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    112 F.3d 146 (4th Cir. 1997)   Cited 13 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that agency cannot decline to conduct further inquiry and then plead its own failure to investigate as reason to conclude that its position was substantially justified

  4. New River Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    945 F.2d 1290 (4th Cir. 1991)   Cited 7 times
    Holding that dress codes are a "condition[] of employment which employees may seek to improve" while receiving the safeguards of the NLRA

  5. Leeward Auto Wreckers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    841 F.2d 1143 (D.C. Cir. 1988)   Cited 4 times
    In Leeward Auto Wreckers, Inc. v. NLRB, 841 F.2d 1143 (D.C. Cir. 1988), we made clear that if the government was substantially justified at first, and it then lost "the protective mantle of `substantial justification,'" plaintiffs could only recover fees incurred after the loss of justification.

  6. Section 142 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 142   Cited 355 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Defining a strike as “any strike or other concerted stoppage of work by employees”