§

Budrovich Contracting Co.

331 N.L.R.B. 1333 (N.L.R.B. 2000)
Budrovich Contracting Co.

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. City Disposal Systems, Inc.

    465 U.S. 822 (1984)   Cited 206 times   9 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a "lone employee's invocation of a right grounded in his collective-bargaining agreement is . . . a concerted activity in a very real sense" because the employee is in effect reminding his employer of the power of the group that brought about the agreement and that could be reharnessed if the employer refuses to respect the employee's objection

  2. Radio Union v. Broadcast Serv

    380 U.S. 255 (1965)   Cited 326 times
    Holding that two entities were a single employer and therefore that their gross receipts could be totaled together to establish jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Interboro Contractors, Inc.

    388 F.2d 495 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 80 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Interboro Contractors, Inc., 388 F.2d 495, 500 (2d Cir. 1967), the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit stated that the efforts of an individual employee acting alone to enforce the provisions of a collective bargaining agreement may be deemed "concerted," and thus protected, at least when the individual's interpretation of the agreement has a reasonable basis.

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Johnnie's Poultry Co.

    344 F.2d 617 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 32 times   11 Legal Analyses
    In N.L.R.B. v. Johnnie's Poultry Co., 8 Cir., 344 F.2d 617, we recognized that an employer has no vested right to insist that union representation be established by a Board conducted election but we further held that an employer acting in good faith belief that a union lacked majority representation was not required to recognize and bargain with the union until such doubt was resolved.

  6. Midland Transp. Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    962 F.2d 1323 (8th Cir. 1992)   Cited 3 times

    Nos. 91-2995, 91-3335. Submitted February 12, 1992. Decided May 4, 1992. John F. Veldey, Marshalltown, Iowa, argued (John B. Grier, on brief), for petitioner Midland Transp. Co., Inc. Karen L. Arndt, Washington, D.C., argued (Paul J. Spielberg, Jerry M. Hunter, D. Randall Frye and Aileen A. Armstrong, on brief), for respondent N.L.R.B. Review of order of National Labor Relations Board. Before BOWMAN, WOLLMAN, Circuit Judges, and WOODS, District Judge. The HONORABLE HENRY WOODS, United States District

  7. A R Transport, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    601 F.2d 311 (7th Cir. 1979)   Cited 5 times
    In A R Transport, Inc. v. NLRB, 601 F.2d 311 (7th Cir. 1979), we held that an interrogation should be judged by the "totality of the circumstances, including the purpose of the interview, the entire statement made to the employee, and the scope of the questioning."

  8. Section 158 - Unfair labor practices

    29 U.S.C. § 158   Cited 10,317 times   84 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees a wage increase without bargaining with Local 355

  9. Section 157 - Right of employees as to organization, collective bargaining, etc.

    29 U.S.C. § 157   Cited 3,302 times   97 Legal Analyses
    Granting employees the right to engage in or refrain from engaging in union activity